Jo Inge Berget [Forward]

joo-inge bear - get (as a sidenote, Berget means The mountain in norwegian/swedish)

Dude who never gives up. He´s abit more uneven in his performances than tinnerholm, he have had a few weaker periods during the 3 years he was in my team. He is still useful when having a bad day thou as he still runs both to open up for the rest of the team and works hard when the other team got the ball. But hes finishes and quality of passing goes down.

Downside of his work ethics might be that he occasionally works abit to hard - meaning he might make some mistakes with the ball due to high pulse. Still, he makes alot of points and is good defensively aswell when playing on the wing.

He was a victim of his own success on the wing, as he himself prefered to play striker, yet he was good enough on the side that he ended up playing there mostly. He never complained about it or made a fuss, but he did state that he saw himself mostly as a forward and that while he would play and do the best he could wherever the coach put him he wanted to play as forward.

(I´m not quite sure that I´m using the right words there - I dont normally discuss sports in this language, pulse in english does mean the amount of beats your heart does /minute right? ;))
 
joo-inge bear - get (as a sidenote, Berget means The mountain in norwegian/swedish)

Dude who never gives up. He´s abit more uneven in his performances than tinnerholm, he have had a few weaker periods during the 3 years he was in my team. He is still useful when having a bad day thou as he still runs both to open up for the rest of the team and works hard when the other team got the ball. But hes finishes and quality of passing goes down.

Downside of his work ethics might be that he occasionally works abit to hard - meaning he might make some mistakes with the ball due to high pulse. Still, he makes alot of points and is good defensively aswell when playing on the wing.

He was a victim of his own success on the wing, as he himself prefered to play striker, yet he was good enough on the side that he ended up playing there mostly. He never complained about it or made a fuss, but he did state that he saw himself mostly as a forward and that while he would play and do the best he could wherever the coach put him he wanted to play as forward.

(I´m not quite sure that I´m using the right words there - I dont normally discuss sports in this language, pulse in english does mean the amount of beats your heart does /minute right? ;))
Your meaning comes through
 
joo-inge bear - get (as a sidenote, Berget means The mountain in norwegian/swedish)

Dude who never gives up. He´s abit more uneven in his performances than tinnerholm, he have had a few weaker periods during the 3 years he was in my team. He is still useful when having a bad day thou as he still runs both to open up for the rest of the team and works hard when the other team got the ball. But hes finishes and quality of passing goes down.

Downside of his work ethics might be that he occasionally works abit to hard - meaning he might make some mistakes with the ball due to high pulse. Still, he makes alot of points and is good defensively aswell when playing on the wing.

He was a victim of his own success on the wing, as he himself prefered to play striker, yet he was good enough on the side that he ended up playing there mostly. He never complained about it or made a fuss, but he did state that he saw himself mostly as a forward and that while he would play and do the best he could wherever the coach put him he wanted to play as forward.

(I´m not quite sure that I´m using the right words there - I dont normally discuss sports in this language, pulse in english does mean the amount of beats your heart does /minute right? ;))
Your insight on him and Tinnerholm have been great. Much appreciated!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee
joo-inge bear - get (as a sidenote, Berget means The mountain in norwegian/swedish)

Dude who never gives up. He´s abit more uneven in his performances than tinnerholm, he have had a few weaker periods during the 3 years he was in my team. He is still useful when having a bad day thou as he still runs both to open up for the rest of the team and works hard when the other team got the ball. But hes finishes and quality of passing goes down.

Downside of his work ethics might be that he occasionally works abit to hard - meaning he might make some mistakes with the ball due to high pulse. Still, he makes alot of points and is good defensively aswell when playing on the wing.

He was a victim of his own success on the wing, as he himself prefered to play striker, yet he was good enough on the side that he ended up playing there mostly. He never complained about it or made a fuss, but he did state that he saw himself mostly as a forward and that while he would play and do the best he could wherever the coach put him he wanted to play as forward.

(I´m not quite sure that I´m using the right words there - I dont normally discuss sports in this language, pulse in english does mean the amount of beats your heart does /minute right? ;))
And Villa likes to drift out wide. If they are swapping and causing full backs and center backs to have to pass marks on at unpredictable moments we are gonna break some teams down.
 
Oh the hypocrisy. Norway, a country whose people literally lose their minds about anything over a tiny immigration increase, especially if it’s African.

FTR, I can be in agreement and also point out the hypocrisy.
To be fair, she somewhat addresses the domestic controversy over immigration in that article.
 
To be fair, I’m not going to read it and don’t know why it’s in a player thread.
Eh. There's tons of off-topic stuff all over these forums. Also lots of people commenting on things they haven't actually read. So I guess it's business as usual on both sides of this one.
 
Eh. There's tons of off-topic stuff all over these forums. Also lots of people commenting on things they haven't actually read. So I guess it's business as usual on both sides of this one.
Yeah, why not slip in some politics. Everyone responds well.
 
What? No. That’s horrible advice. That is how you go broke and/or wreck shit.
I worded it poorly. I was thinking of negotiating the difficulties of political dialogue as more of a skill and less like trying to fight a physical property of the universe.