Away - 10/15 New England

Status
Not open for further replies.

LionNYC

Registered
Staff member
Elite Donor
Seasoned Supporter
Jan 2, 2015
20,517
35,128
303
New York, NY
New York City FC at New England Revolution
Sunday, October 15th 5 PM
YES, WFAN (Online)
Stream on Fox Sports Go (with a cable subscription) and MLS Live (out of NY market)

Our penultimate match of the season is in New England.

Maxi Moralez will be suspended due to yellow card accumulation. The last time that Moralez did not play, we won 2-0 in LA.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
New York City FC at New England Revolution
Sunday, October 15th 5 PM
YES, WFAN (Online)
Stream on Fox Sports Go (with a cable subscription) and MLS Live (out of NY market)

Our penultimate match of the season is in New England.

Maxi Moralez will be suspended due to yellow card accumulation.
Pencil in TMac into the starting 11 :unamused:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
Will be going up with the TR for this one. Anybody else?
 
This is going to be an incredibly difficult game. Winning this would be one of the most impressive wins all season, but we should be well-rested, nearly fully healed and game-planning for 2 weeks. I really don't know what NE does so well at home, but if we play as well as we did in Chicago, we should at least get a result.
 
This is going to be an incredibly difficult game. Winning this would be one of the most impressive wins all season, but we should be well-rested, nearly fully healed and game-planning for 2 weeks. I really don't know what NE does so well at home, but if we play as well as we did in Chicago, we should at least get a result.
Does anybody know whether teams that play on turf have more of a home field advantage than teams that play on grass? I started compiling home vs. away points but it was time-consuming so I figured I'd ask if anybody else had done it before I went further.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert and Ulrich
Does anybody know whether teams that play on turf have more of a home field advantage than teams that play on grass? I started compiling home vs. away points but it was time-consuming so I figured I'd ask if anybody else had done it before I went further.
It's a hard thing to analyze. I just eyeballed H/A differential, and realized the teams with the highest variance between home and away are the ones who really stink away, which doesn't tell you much about their home field advantage.
The best home records in order are Toronto, Atlanta, Columbus, New England/Chicago [tie], Houston and NYC. Apart from it being almost all East teams, I don't see a pattern.
 
It's a hard thing to analyze. I just eyeballed H/A differential, and realized the teams with the highest variance between home and away are the ones who really stink away, which doesn't tell you much about their home field advantage.
The best home records in order are Toronto, Atlanta, Columbus, New England/Chicago [tie], Houston and NYC. Apart from it being almost all East teams, I don't see a pattern.
I think it would be interesting to take a look at those teams with home turf fields and how they perform away at stadiums with turf vs grass.
 
Does anybody know whether teams that play on turf have more of a home field advantage than teams that play on grass? I started compiling home vs. away points but it was time-consuming so I figured I'd ask if anybody else had done it before I went further.
Stolen from one of my favorite threads on BigSoccer created by the poster Knave: http://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/th...arcical-figures.2066459/page-21#post-35922789
3misc-png.112388


It would be difficult to develop a pattern because league wide home field advantage has become rather significant for all teams. 1.901 HPPG vs. 0.862 APPG
Also, you would probably need multiple years to reduce variance. Replace an off day loss with 3 points for a team and you get almost .2 PPG increase. Taking into consideration other variables like early season cold-weather impacts up north, hot weather impacts down south, altitude in Colorado and Salt Lake, unusually large crowds in Seattle and Atlanta among other factors that can easily distort a teams HPPG more significantly than turf, and any data will be difficult to present any patterns.

Only 6 teams use turf, further increasing the impact of variance, and lastly not all of them are the same and could theoretically increase or decrease the advantage.
 
While we are talking about turf, I was reminded of an article I read recently which has had me terrified about this game. The NFLPA has been complaining about the new fieldturf put down recently (I don't know when) at Gillette stadium.

NFLPA asks Patriots to remedy turf issues at Gillette Stadium
"Concerned about the new playing surface at Gillette Stadium, the NFLPA has asked the New England Patriots to repair what it believes to be a field that poses an injury risk to players, according to NFLPA assistant executive director George Atallah.

"It's a reminder to all teams that they can't have players on [shoddy] fields," Atallah said.

The NFLPA recently sent its field inspector to Gillette Stadium to inspect the new playing surface, and found the field "borderline actionable."

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...-patriots-remedy-turf-issues-gillette-stadium

I'm not sure if any significant work was done to improve the field. I'm also not sure how serious this was, or if it was simplyt the NFLPA blowing hot air at an influential owner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adam and SoupInNYC
It would be interesting to see whether teams on artificial turf have a bigger edge. I think the way to do it is look at teams that play on grass and see what their away record is on grass vs. turf. Might even work to look at all teams as the fake stuff can vary a lot in how it plays.

After witnessing the shitshow that was the game against the Cosmos last season, I have to think a fake surface benefits those who are used to the high bounces and skipping balls.
 
This is going to be an incredibly difficult game. Winning this would be one of the most impressive wins all season, but we should be well-rested, nearly fully healed and game-planning for 2 weeks. I really don't know what NE does so well at home, but if we play as well as we did in Chicago, we should at least get a result.

Nearly fully healed? That's if none of our internationals return from NT duty with an injury. Let's keep in mind that Villa, Chanot, Ring and Herrera already did, so there's precedent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
Nearly fully healed? That's if none of our internationals return from NT duty with an injury. Let's keep in mind that Villa, Chanot, Ring and Herrera already did, so there's precedent.
I'm not sure we have anyone other than Jack called up to international duty, so we may be dodging bullets this go round.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
It would be interesting to see whether teams on artificial turf have a bigger edge. I think the way to do it is look at teams that play on grass and see what their away record is on grass vs. turf. Might even work to look at all teams as the fake stuff can vary a lot in how it plays.

After witnessing the shitshow that was the game against the Cosmos last season, I have to think a fake surface benefits those who are used to the high bounces and skipping balls.

true it will be difficult...they havent lost since July
 
It would be interesting to see whether teams on artificial turf have a bigger edge. I think the way to do it is look at teams that play on grass and see what their away record is on grass vs. turf. Might even work to look at all teams as the fake stuff can vary a lot in how it plays.

After witnessing the shitshow that was the game against the Cosmos last season, I have to think a fake surface benefits those who are used to the high bounces and skipping balls.
I wouldn't be surprised if travel has more to do with it. Foxboro is eastern most stadium in MLS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
Status
Not open for further replies.