Jack Harrison to Manchester City - Official

Ha, no, I'm just a guy who's bad at copy-pasting links. Fixed now.

Yes, my biggest thing is that MLS hasn't changed the maximum amount of GAM a team can receive from a transfer. $4M or $10M doesn't make a difference is a team just gets a maximum of $650K GAM. Up that to $1.5M and it may make a difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dummyrun
Yes, my biggest thing is that MLS hasn't changed the maximum amount of GAM a team can receive from a transfer. $4M or $10M doesn't make a difference is a team just gets a maximum of $650K GAM. Up that to $1.5M and it may make a difference.

It does make some difference as long as we have enough TAM to free up a DP slot. But yeah, this whole thing would make way more sense for NYCFC if the GAM cut were enough to buy down a player on its own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
Yes, my biggest thing is that MLS hasn't changed the maximum amount of GAM a team can receive from a transfer. $4M or $10M doesn't make a difference is a team just gets a maximum of $650K GAM. Up that to $1.5M and it may make a difference.
The league should get at most 10% of any transfer. The club takes the chance on the player developing them and giving them minutes on the field - if they want to let a proven player on the team walk, then they should get the bulk of the money.
 
I think Harrison to Stoke is very positive for the league in general (in a way that Villa to the World Cup is not).

There's already been an uptick in quality English players coming here for college, but this should solidify the belief that you can get to the Premier League through the US. And, as mentioned, Jack has been an excellent player for us, but by no means a world-beater.
 
So maybe I'm critiquing the MLS roster rules a bit, but is there any chance if we sell him now we get 2/3 of the fee? Hear me out...

"A club shall receive two-thirds (2/3) of the corresponding transfer or loan fee revenue (including agent fees and other expenses), from any transaction involving a player that is NOT a Homegrown Player, Generation adidas Player, or player acquired via the MLS SuperDraft."

Jack is NOT a Homegrown player and has graduated from the GA program.

Now we acquired Jack via a trade with Chicago - not via the Superdraft as that is how Chicago acquired him.

Any chance here or am I just reaching?

Source: https://www.mlssoccer.com/league/official-rules/mls-roster-rules-and-regulations
 
So maybe I'm critiquing the MLS roster rules a bit, but is there any chance if we sell him now we get 2/3 of the fee? Hear me out...

"A club shall receive two-thirds (2/3) of the corresponding transfer or loan fee revenue (including agent fees and other expenses), from any transaction involving a player that is NOT a Homegrown Player, Generation adidas Player, or player acquired via the MLS SuperDraft."

Jack is NOT a Homegrown player and has graduated from the GA program.

Now we acquired Jack via a trade with Chicago - not via the Superdraft as that is how Chicago acquired him.

Any chance here or am I just reaching?

Source: https://www.mlssoccer.com/league/official-rules/mls-roster-rules-and-regulations

I believe you are correct. In the trade when announced from the commissioner, it was a player to be named later. So we acquired Harrison via a trade and not via the SuperDraft. MORE MONEY PLEASE!

So when you think about it, we've tripled our investment in Harrison. We paid probably $250K GAM for him (plus the 4th round pick of Brandon Vincent who Chicago selected) and will get $650K GAM. And we'll be able to use the reminder of the funds to likely pay in full the construction of the training facility. Good business.
 
Last edited:
Say we include those incentives to get the transfer fee up and a sell on clause...

We get $650K GAM from the initial transfer...

Would we get any additional transfer into GAM after the incentives kick in and more importantly for a future sale? Or are we capped at $650K?
 
Say we include those incentives to get the transfer fee up and a sell on clause...

We get $650K GAM from the initial transfer...

Would we get any additional transfer into GAM after the incentives kick in and more importantly for a future sale? Or are we capped at $650K?
A sell on fee would have the end result of the transfer fee being a higher initial number. Doesn’t help the GAM, just the extra $ in the coffers for club operations.
 
A sell on fee would have the end result of the transfer fee being a higher initial number. Doesn’t help the GAM, just the extra $ in the coffers for club operations.

Hmm...what if MLS decides to expand the amount of GAM from transfers to the stated 1.5M GAM based on tweets. Would the sell on clause result in more GAM above the additional $650K we'll receive? Would it apply to backdated transfers since the sell on part would be after the rule change? This can get so MLSy.
 
Hmm...what if MLS decides to expand the amount of GAM from transfers to the stated 1.5M GAM based on tweets. Would the sell on clause result in more GAM above the additional $650K we'll receive? Would it apply to backdated transfers since the sell on part would be after the rule change? This can get so MLSy.
Last year MLS didn't release the 2017 rules until February. Transfers should have been one of the most important topics of the winter meetings so it wouldn't surprise me if there are different rules for 2018 that we don't know about yet because they haven't been publicly released.
 
YOUTH YOUTH YOUTH !!! Has been thrown in my face since i was forced against my will to accept this organization . Now this getting rid of its best young player that scores and Loved by fans . Not to mention a Mum that dropped everything in her life to come to this country and become an unofficial ambassador and team Mom . ABSOLUTELY UNACCEPTABLE !

I Don't want to hear Shit about the money or how good this will be for the boy . Fuck that !! What about the money and seat loss this team incurs with this Stupid Decision?? The fan base loyalty shot to hell . You mean with all his youth and skill and the fact he's known that means Crap ?? Business decisions that are just plain idiotic and bad . You fuckin match or up shit to keep a good thing Assholes !!

Last David poor Batman loosing his Robin . Its bad enough with all the new faces he has no clue who his team is cause he doesn't know them . My best advice to you David is go back to Spain and get your old job back at least you'll be with a real team that wins .

THANK YOU Jack for all you did and for who you are and the Mother that made it all possible when i meet y'all you were wonderful !! Now this team and organization can say with truth ....They Don't know Jack ! God Bless You and on to a better life and people who will appreciate you . So sad sweetie you have my heart and will be missed !!!​
 
The Stoke City FC subreddit is not exactly on fire about this.
Isn't it in the Reddit TOS that all posts must fall into at least one of three categories:
1. Massively mis-informed
2. Put a negative spin on any and all topics.
3. Be overly cynical.

Anything that does not meet the criteria gets instantly deleted. I never read their TOS, but based on whatever I've read when linked there, it must be true.
 
So did any of the twitterati see Harrison arriving at Stoke? Players are coming into camp, any news that he’s not there?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
So did any of the twitterati see Harrison arriving at Stoke? Players are coming into camp, any news that he’s not there?

he was taking flight from LA to nyc .....the rumor on twitter is that wednesday the news will be made official. all signs point that this will happen
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
Isn't it in the Reddit TOS that all posts must fall into at least one of three categories:
1. Massively mis-informed
2. Put a negative spin on any and all topics.
3. Be overly cynical.

Anything that does not meet the criteria gets instantly deleted. I never read their TOS, but based on whatever I've read when linked there, it must be true.

Idk man this sounds kinda cynical, you sure you weren't trying to post on /r/nycfc?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee