MLS Digital Hires Rachel Bonnetta (Bonnetta leaves for FOX Sports in 2016)

Working the dog show is a promotion for her. I've seen her in other things. She's their next Katie Nolan (who I can't stand)
 
Can we get a mod ( LionNYC LionNYC ?) to change the title of this thread? I'm happy to be that guy -- doesn't seem like an inviting title for the women on this board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee
Can we get a mod ( LionNYC LionNYC ?) to change the title of this thread? I'm happy to be that guy -- doesn't seem like an inviting title for the women on this board.

Yes, I also don't find the title of this thread appropriate. The Forums welcomes all fans (except those that post a dozen high quality pictures in a single post).
 
Can we get a mod ( LionNYC LionNYC ?) to change the title of this thread? I'm happy to be that guy -- doesn't seem like an inviting title for the women on this board.
This made me chuckle because I don't think there are many women on this board. Partially because of the kinda thing you're talking about, perhaps. But still. It is sausage central in here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Goodfella
This made me chuckle because I don't think there are many women on this board. Partially because of the kinda thing you're talking about, perhaps. But still. It is sausage central in here.
Women are way too busy with dishes, laundry, grocery shopping and making me dinner to be spending time on an internet message board.





Relax, it's just a classic joke!
 
Can we get a mod ( LionNYC LionNYC ?) to change the title of this thread? I'm happy to be that guy -- doesn't seem like an inviting title for the women on this board.
I'm torn on this and appreciate your intent, but in an ideal world I feel like men and women would freely sexually objectify each other. I understand that it's easier to welcome objectification when one enjoys the privilege of mostly not being objectified, and that a lot of women don't enjoy that privilege. But I also question whether not objectifying a person sexually makes one more likely to conceive of them as a fully-formed person. In other words, I think it would be better if instead of censoring ourselves (subtracting parts of what we think from what we say), we broadened how we think (and talk) about individuals.

ETA: feel free to objectify me sexually on this board.
 
This made me chuckle because I don't think there are many women on this board. Partially because of the kinda thing you're talking about, perhaps. But still. It is sausage central in here.

Didn’t NYCFC_Dan NYCFC_Dan once release forum stats a couple years back and there were way more women on the board than anyone expected?
 
I'm torn on this and appreciate your intent, but in an ideal world I feel like men and women would freely sexually objectify each other. I understand that it's easier to welcome objectification when one enjoys the privilege of mostly not being objectified, and that a lot of women don't enjoy that privilege. But I also question whether not objectifying a person sexually makes one more likely to conceive of them as a fully-formed person. In other words, I think it would be better if instead of censoring ourselves (subtracting parts of what we think from what we say), we broadened how we think (and talk) about individuals.

ETA: feel free to objectify me sexually on this board.
Dude, you are so loose with your intellectual pondering
 
  • Like
Reactions: adam
Feel free to tear me apart (sexually or intellectually, lol). I figure you learn 0% about the opinions you don't voice. Which is why I worry so much about the censorship / tone policing / what-have-you going on today.
I can’t tell if my comment went over your head or not
 
ETA: feel free to objectify me sexually on this board.

giphy.gif