Race for CCL Spot 2019

Based on the Language in the CONCACAF Document, Have We Qualified For the 2019 CCL? - Moot Poll Now

  • Yes - We Qualified

    Votes: 28 84.8%
  • No - We Did Not Qualify

    Votes: 5 15.2%

  • Total voters
    33
What is the CCL situation for the NYCFC, of course........ About the subway, it must be 24/7 for ever!!!!!

That my friend we are all wondering. But someone here did find a rule that said in the event of a federation and CCF disagreeing, CCF gets to have their way. So, if CCF announced NYCFC is in AND they have not changed their minds; then they are in. But then why wouldn’t NYCFC announce it as so? This is so MLS.
 
This exchange is either real or imagined.

CONCACAF to USSoccer/MLS: We are changing the CCL format like you wanted. How do you want to pick the 2019 qualifiers?

USS/MLS: Here. Cut and paste this into your regs.

Flash forward to December, 2017.

CONCACAF: Congrats to NYCFC for qualifying for 2019 CCL.

USS/MLS: Why did you send that press release?

CONCACAF: We used the rules you gave us. NYCFC is in.

USS/MLS: No they aren't, the spot is based on aggregate points from 17-18.

CONCACAF: That's not what the language says and BTW we get to decide how to interpret our rules.

USS/MLS: Not here. You asked us for the rules about '19 qualification. We know what they mean.

CONCACAF: [Silence signifying the screwing of NYCFC].
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LionNYC and Kjbert
Don’t be tangential, start a favorite dog breed thread, weve got 3 more long months until live soccer to survive
I know this further hijacks the thread, but i was mentions and following proper debate logic I should be allowed to retort. Yes? good.

That beautiful specimen as my avatar is a siberian husky, tyvm! :triumph:

and to close the tangent I offer 'exibit A' which not only shows the difference, but nicely fits theme of shibas ridding stuff.

upload_2017-12-18_16-11-30.png

Boom! NYCFC Debate Team look me up if you need an alternate. I can be the wildcard you need.
giphy.gif
 
I know this further hijacks the thread, but i was mentions and following proper debate logic I should be allowed to retort. Yes? good.

That beautiful specimen as my avatar is a siberian husky, tyvm! :triumph:

and to close the tangent I offer 'exibit A' which not only shows the difference, but nicely fits theme of shibas ridding stuff.

View attachment 7797
I want to cuddle that fucking Shiba for like an hour. Don't judge me.
 
I know this further hijacks the thread, but i was mentions and following proper debate logic I should be allowed to retort. Yes? good.

That beautiful specimen as my avatar is a siberian husky, tyvm! :triumph:

and to close the tangent I offer 'exibit A' which not only shows the difference, but nicely fits theme of shibas ridding stuff.

View attachment 7797

Boom! NYCFC Debate Team look me up if you need an alternate. I can be the wildcard you need.
giphy.gif
Wait, someone called your avatar a Shiba? Stop this madness.

Funny enough, I have a Portuguese Podengo pequeno that is all of 9 pounds. As a primitive dog, she loves both breeds. But she adores huskies. She hates most any other big dogs, including podengos. But she loves any dog that looks wolf-like. She herself looks like a fox. But she's probably quicker.

Bad thing is, she hates French Bulldogs, or any bulldogs, because she sees them for the genetic abomination, biological expression of human hubris they are. And we live in HK, ie, the new Chelsea.

She doesn't even try to fight bulldogs. She just refuses to acknowledge they exist. My dog may be breedist.

But she likes any kind of fluffy, curly hair dog she can chase and snap at their hair. It's her favorite thing to do.

Wait. someone move this to the stadium thread where it's more topical.
 

interesting.....so the question becomes did concacaf "conveniently" interpret regulations as single year totals rather than 2017 and 2018?

"English text will be authoritative" yet english speakers cant agree on what the wording meant. :D

im starting to want to change my vote in the poll from no to yes