Columbus (Away) - Postmatch

Did they have 1 win and 37 draws?


Sure, team media may try to spin 1 win 7 draws positively, but the fans wont be happy with that. Now somewhere in between is different. 4 wins 4 draws is not 1 and 7
Lol, I'm just being a dick. I agree that 1 win and 7 draws would not be good at all. Arsenal went 26-12-0 (WDL), but did have a stretch of 7 games where they went 2-5-0 towards the end of the year, getting 11 points across 7 games. Granted it was their worst run of games across that incredible season.
 
Did they have 1 win and 37 draws?


Sure, team media may try to spin 1 win 7 draws positively, but 5he fans wont be happy with that. Now somewhere in between is different. 4 wins 4 draws is not 1 and 7
For perspective, 1Win/7Draws is equal to 3w/1d/4l

4 wins/4Draws is equal to 5w/1d/2l
 
I didn't think this play was controversial at all, but it apparently made it into this week's Instant Replay.

https://www.mlssoccer.com/post/2019...other-orlando-pk-instant-replay?autoplay=true

Warshaw thinks it should have been DOGSO on Chanot because he made a play on the ball, and then Argudo stepped on him causing him to fall. I don't see how this makes sense at all.
It doesn't make sense. It's completely stupid. Argudo put his shoulder hard into Chanot challenging for the ball, and Chanot went down. The fact that Chanot stuck out his leg to get the ball and touched neither ball nor Argudo doesn't make it a foul on Chanot. The fact that Argudo then stepped on a prone Chanot also doesn't make it a foul on Chanot.
 
It doesn't make sense. It's completely stupid. Argudo put his shoulder hard into Chanot challenging for the ball, and Chanot went down. The fact that Chanot stuck out his leg to get the ball and touched neither ball nor Argudo doesn't make it a foul on Chanot. The fact that Argudo then stepped on a prone Chanot also doesn't make it a foul on Chanot.
It makes sense if it's more important to accrue clicks and conversation than it is to get to the truth :p
 
It doesn't make sense. It's completely stupid. Argudo put his shoulder hard into Chanot challenging for the ball, and Chanot went down. The fact that Chanot stuck out his leg to get the ball and touched neither ball nor Argudo doesn't make it a foul on Chanot. The fact that Argudo then stepped on a prone Chanot also doesn't make it a foul on Chanot.
I was arguing this with a friend of mine who is a Crew fan and he's saying that Chanot slid underneath Argudo.

But when you look at where Argudo steps, it's outside of his shoulders and I wouldn't call that "underneath" himself.

upload_2019-6-4_14-39-23.png