Why do you say that?
because they are winning
Why do you say that?
Why do you say that?
They set out an actual starting XI while we did not.
And yes... Cause they're winning.
Also, once again we're doing a line change at half time.. shouldn't we be seeing at least some of our starting guys going a full 90 by now? Or at least close to it.
I don't see why our lineup was not closer to a starting XI?They set out an actual starting XI while we did not.
And yes... Cause they're winning.
Also, once again we're doing a line change at half time.. shouldn't we be seeing at least some of our starting guys going a full 90 by now? Or at least close to it.
I don't see why our lineup was not closer to a starting XI?
Stuver, Scally, Chanot, Sands, Callens; Ring, Zelalem, Parks; Mitriță, Héber, Mackay-Steven
This is two or three shy of starting XI. Two of those cannot even play, and we don't know about tinnerholm... Besides, this is still preseason and yes we have a month until CCL but to say this isn't close to our starting XI is absurd imo
not really? i mean there are still two games, those may be more when they go full 90 because they are closer to the competitive game. i dont think starting XI went 90 till the nashville game last year IIRC.
EDIT: also we still have missing johnson, mata, tinnerholm ( for some reason) maxi ( injury) and possibly taty ( depending on the shape). so there are missing pieces.
I mean, our lineup was pretty close with who was available. I see several probable starters missing for LAFC.They set out an actual starting XI while we did not.
And yes... Cause they're winning.
Also, once again we're doing a line change at half time.. shouldn't we be seeing at least some of our starting guys going a full 90 by now? Or at least close to it.