RUMOR: Messi to MCFC and NYCFC

Higgs1

Registered
Jul 12, 2018
46
86
18
35
Queens, NY
Man City would be better off spending the £150 million that Messi will cost over three years on Haaland’s transfer fee. If it’s about product on the field.
That's fair, but I find it hard to believe it wouldn't be more about money it can make them via both messi in MCFC and then in NYCFC, the kit sales, the attendance booms, etc. But agreed Haaland longterm would be the better on field decision, can we get them to send him to us in 10 years? lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert

Kjbert

Registered
Seasoned Supporter
Apr 24, 2014
10,908
16,049
303
36
As good as City have been this season, is there a top side in the world more sorely lacking of a CF than City right now? Maybe Barcelona.
 

Gotham Gator

Registered
Donor
Feb 9, 2015
10,996
22,867
353
55
Bronxville, NY
Given a choice between Haaland and Messi, I would also go Haaland, but I think its a false choice.

Messi will be 34 when the next Premier League season begins. That's not worth a huge investment.

However, he is still performing at a very high level. He has 19 goals and 8 assists in 24 league games, and 4 goals and 2 assists in 5 Champions League games. There's not a team in the world he couldn't go to and improve. The question is how long that remains the case.

Also, with Messi there is an additional benefit to some clubs, but not all. The hype factor. His arrival anywhere will be huge and drive tremendous press and fan interest. Some clubs need that a lot more than others. Man City needs it very little. You have to wonder if another Club wanting to step up to a higher level of world recognition will step up and pay him more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert and Marito

Higgs1

Registered
Jul 12, 2018
46
86
18
35
Queens, NY
Given a choice between Haaland and Messi, I would also go Haaland, but I think its a false choice.

Messi will be 34 when the next Premier League season begins. That's not worth a huge investment.

However, he is still performing at a very high level. He has 19 goals and 8 assists in 24 league games, and 4 goals and 2 assists in 5 Champions League games. There's not a team in the world he couldn't go to and improve. The question is how long that remains the case.

Also, with Messi there is an additional benefit to some clubs, but not all. The hype factor. His arrival anywhere will be huge and drive tremendous press and fan interest. Some clubs need that a lot more than others. Man City needs it very little. You have to wonder if another Club wanting to step up to a higher level of world recognition will step up and pay him more.

Very solid point, I think however, that he'll end up in 1 of 3 places, PSG, Man City, or stay at Barcelona. I don't see him really going anywhere else. Obviously I'm partial to him getting into the city fold and hopefully come here for short period, he'd still run circles around this league at 36, 37, etc. and the boost he'd provide our team would be imaginable, how many people would want to come play here to play with him, how many fans would want to see him live, etc. Hard to fantasize about it, but definitely hoping it comes to fruition. I wouldn't be shocked if he ended up in Miami if he does not sign with city (after more time at barca or PSG).
 

Fantazma

Registered
Seasoned Supporter
Nov 9, 2014
7,159
8,145
303
Messi might stay, they voted in a new president ( or old president since he was there before) at Barcelona.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert