UEFA Champions League 19/20

  • Welcome to NYCFC Forums 2.0. Since completing our upgrade I've had a number of people request to make a donation. If you'd like to Donate you may do so via this Paypal link below. Thank you all for the support and your willingness to cobtribute.
Consider becoming a 'donor' member to help support the forums! Click Here To Upgrade

SoupInNYC

Senior Member
Elite Donor
Mar 9, 2015
4,697
10,644
303
32
UES

I know they have the coefficients and everything but it still seems sort of bullshitty to me that Ajax have to go through qualifying after winning the Eiridivisie and their run in cL last year.
I don’t follow the European leagues enough to really understand how this is all done, but if Ajax playing in the earlier rounds results in more minutes for Dest, then I’m all for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schwallacus

Schwallacus

Active Member
Elite Donor
Jan 14, 2016
1,211
3,039
233
White Plains
I also think it's ridiculous that"Champions league" is not for champions/runner up only. It's quite ridiculous, not sure if my last post made it sound otherwise.
It's somewhat crazy that it isn't just the champions and runners up of most/all European Leagues, but I think it made more sense before the massive player transfers of modern day footy. Back in the day most players on a team were from or close by the city that they played for, which made sense to have the champions from all over Europe come together to have a tournament of champions. However, if we did that now it would be a terrible tournament for the group stage and probably the first knockout round or two. It wouldn't be exciting to see Bayern, Man City, or Barca crush the champions of Estonia, Luxembourg, or Finland. With the way the bigger leagues have so much more money and can create these mega teams, it isn't fair any longer for smaller countries or those with nowhere near as much money to be competitive. It made sense back in the 60's, 70's, and 80's as teams across Europe were at a similar level, being champions of their respective country's league. Just look at the champions from the 60s-80s;
61-62- Benfica
63- Milan
64-65- Inter
66- Real Madrid
67- Celtic
68- Man United
69- Milan
70- Feyenoord
71-73- Ajax
74-76- Bayern
77-78- Liverpool
79-80- Nottingham Forest
81- Liverpool
82- Aston Villa
83- Hamburg
84- Liverpool
85- Juventus
86- Steaua Bucuresti
87- Porto
88- PSV Eindhoven
89-90- Milan
91- Red Star Belgrade

Now a lot of those teams are still big today, but when will Benfica, Porto, Red Star Belgrade, Celtic, or Steaua Bucuresti challenge for the title again? Not anytime soon. The best players of their country barely even play for clubs within their country anymore. It would be cool to see it again, but I'd rather watch the top 32 clubs in Europe in a tournament than the top 1/2 of each European nation.
 

Falastur

Senior Member
Staff member
Donor
Seasoned Supporter
Mar 20, 2014
3,378
4,544
353
32
Herts, UK
Thanks for the clarification I just remember an old World Soccer I had with an article by Keir Radnege following the 97 Cup winner's cup on why (Ronaldo's) Barcelona would be worthy runners up for entering the Champion's league and PSG would not. Couldn't have conceived at the time it would go from Runner's up to 3rd and 4th place finishers.
Actually I should probably be 100% accurate - there are club coefficients and country coefficients. The country coefficient determines how many teams you enter and where they enter, the club coefficient determines the individual seeding.

That said, your comment seemed to focus more on the club coefficient point so my previous post still stands. Just wanted to clear up any potential confusion.

I also think it's ridiculous that"Champions league" is not for champions/runner up only. It's quite ridiculous, not sure if my last post made it sound otherwise.
True, though that's a decision going back absolutely decades now. I can be a bit of a purist but I can tolerate this, if for no other reason than that the old one-team-per-country version produced statistics such as this one: in the first 25 versions of the Champions Cup, seven teams won the competition in consecutive seasons (Real winning as many as five in a row), with those seven winning streaks being responsible for 19 of the first 25 competition wins.
 

Falastur

Senior Member
Staff member
Donor
Seasoned Supporter
Mar 20, 2014
3,378
4,544
353
32
Herts, UK
Back in the day most players on a team were from or close by the city that they played for, which made sense to have the champions from all over Europe come together to have a tournament of champions.
You're right that this used to be a thing, but it died out long before the Champions League came about. Bear in mind, for instance, that Inter Milan split off from AC in 1908 over an argument over whether to sign foreign players (hence the name "Internazionale").
 

LionNYC

Senior Member
Staff member
Elite Donor
Seasoned Supporter
Jan 2, 2015
14,946
25,885
303
New York, NY
It's sudden death penalties between FC Copehnagen and Red Star Belgrade. There have been a lot of misses as they're hitting these on basically a spot of mud.

For right footed players, the left standing foot is about 1 inch lower due to the ground being eaten up.
 

Davo15

Active Member
May 20, 2014
1,304
2,185
203
39
Hamden CT
Ajax Squeezed through

Celtic are out! Which makes me :D but I do worry about Scotland's coefficient or what not when my Gers are back in the Champions league hopefully next season.
 

NYCFC_Dan

Senior Member
Staff member
Seasoned Supporter
Mar 17, 2014
6,554
13,035
303
29
Tampa, Florida
Yikes, how does Porto not win that matchup.
I didn’t think qualifying was this tough. There’s another round they have to go through now. Some of these teams haven’t even started their season yet.