USA vs. England, Tuesday 7/2 3pm, FOX (Semifinals)

  • Welcome to NYCFC Forums 2.0. Since completing our upgrade I've had a number of people request to make a donation. If you'd like to Donate you may do so via this Paypal link below. Thank you all for the support and your willingness to cobtribute.
Consider becoming a 'donor' member to help support the forums! Click Here To Upgrade

Keith Putnam

Senior Member
Donor
Seasoned Supporter
May 4, 2015
2,274
4,769
323
41
Astoria
highwatermedia.com
it was a foul
Commentators on Twitter are supporting your position by noting that even "passive" interference with an attempted shot in the form of the attacker catching part of the defender is often given as a foul. I guess this falls into the category where I get grumpy that fouls get called on players who have no agency in the fouling action.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee

Ulrich

Senior Member
Elite Donor
Donor
Seasoned Supporter
Nov 5, 2015
12,846
24,717
353
We’d be livid if that call went against us
There was zero marking on that play and the defenders weren’t even playing the trap.... USA got lucky and it was so razor thin I wouldn’t have argued if it was allowed to stand.

Hell, even the keeper stayed on her line rather than charge out.... so many mistakes.
 

mgarbowski

Senior Member
Elite Donor
Donor
Seasoned Supporter
Jul 16, 2014
11,532
32,615
353
Queens, NY
mgarbowski.com
How? Sauerbrunn initiated zero contact. England player picked up her leg as part of her running motion and caught Sauerbrunn.
Commentators on Twitter are supporting your position by noting that even "passive" interference with an attempted shot in the form of the attacker catching part of the defender is often given as a foul. I guess this falls into the category where I get grumpy that fouls get called on players who have no agency in the fouling action.
I don't see Saurbrunn as having no agency there. The play is in front of her. White, with the ball, is in front of her. You can't clip the player's foot from behind. It wasn't intentional by any means, but that doesn't mean she didn't have an opportunity, and agency to avoid it.

But it's moot because England can't take PKs anywhere ever, and this one was especially terrible.
 
Last edited:

Gotham Gator

Senior Member
Donor
Feb 9, 2015
9,604
19,632
353
53
Bronxville, NY
Really? All of the many replays looked to me like Sauerbrunn's leg was going to come down in stride where it did regardless of whether there was an attacker's leg there or not.
It’s hard to know for sure. I think it’s possible she felt her only play was to give the attacker a little nudge from behind and knock her off. It was subtle and smart and she almost got away with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee

21Architect

Junior Member
Sep 16, 2015
684
987
93
46
There was zero marking on that play and the defenders weren’t even playing the trap.... USA got lucky and it was so razor thin I wouldn’t have argued if it was allowed to stand.

Hell, even the keeper stayed on her line rather than charge out.... so many mistakes.

Do you know what call I was talking about?
 

Ulrich

Senior Member
Elite Donor
Donor
Seasoned Supporter
Nov 5, 2015
12,846
24,717
353
Do you know what call I was talking about?
I assume the Offsides on England that called back the Goal. If you were talking about another play, my apologies.

If the offsides, then I disagree - I wouldn’t be livid over the call if the goal stood because it was razor thin and the US blew the marking, got lucky on the offsides since they weren’t actively playing it, and the keeper was flat footed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Christopher Jee