Video Assistant Referee

  • Welcome to NYCFC Forums 2.0. Since completing our upgrade I've had a number of people request to make a donation. If you'd like to Donate you may do so via this Paypal link below. Thank you all for the support and your willingness to cobtribute.
Consider becoming a 'donor' member to help support the forums! Click Here To Upgrade

Ulrich

Senior Member
Elite Donor
Donor
Seasoned Supporter
Nov 5, 2015
13,444
25,792
353
#JusticeForAleks
Gofundme.com/Justiceforalexandanewcarforme
Not only are you a trivia hound (err, working dog), but you also have mastered wit & sarcasm.... there's a bright future for you in social media - as long as you don't sniff a co-worker or see a ball thrown.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rimil

mgarbowski

Senior Member
Elite Donor
Donor
Seasoned Supporter
Jul 16, 2014
12,254
34,945
353
Queens, NY
mgarbowski.com

My opposition to VAR (replay, video review) is well documented. This article presents the best argument for it that I have seen:

"For instance, in 1999, the N.F.L. added a check on referee influence by instituting instant replay and coaches’ challenges. The next season, the home winning percentage dropped from 59.6 percent to 55.6. It was 51.7 percent this season, the lowest mark since 1972."​
I think home field advantage is a good thing. But home field advantage due to referee intimidation/appeasement or whatever is not good. Also, this is the closest I have seen to a stat that indicates (however indirectly) that the cumulative effect of all replay decisions is to improve accuracy and game results.
 
Last edited:

FootyLovin

No better obsession
Elite Donor
Donor
Seasoned Supporter
Feb 15, 2015
2,869
7,628
323
47
Sea Cliff NY

My opposition to VAR (replay, video review) is well documented. This article presents the best argument for it that I have seen:

"For instance, in 1999, the N.F.L. added a check on referee influence by instituting instant replay and coaches’ challenges. The next season, the home winning percentage dropped from 59.6 percent to 55.6. It was 51.7 percent this season, the lowest mark since 1972."​
I think home field advantage is a good thing. But home field advantage due to referee intimidation/appeasement or whatever is not good. Also, this is the closest I have seen to a stat that indicates (however indirectly) that the cumulative effect of all replay decisions is to improve accuracy and game results.
Psychologically it makes perfect sense. Also, though I hate this, it justifies all the players and coaches complaining incessantly. Refs unconscious decision making gets influenced by the perception of wrong doing.