A draw would have been much more productive.Orlando result good
Why? Think we are catching Revs???A draw would have been much more productive.
Even before the New England win, the only possible target was--and is--Montreal.Why? Think we are catching Revs???
Didn't really want to go there, but, practically, I don't think City's catching anybody.Why? Think we are catching Revs???
How do you capitalize when you speak?He can't even capitalize the letter "I" properly.
So Orlando losing to Revs is a preferred outcome. Thanks.Didn't really want to go there, but, practically, I don't think City's catching anybody.
Montreal can lose FOUR times and still be even with City.
If Impact wins six of their remaining 10 matches, City is done.
Mathematically, City has as much of a chance as catching the Revs as they do catching United or the Red Bulls. When you consider there's six teams ahead of us, one of them has to meltdown totally and City can't lose or draw another game, it's pretty close to hopeless.
The thing everybody (including me) wants to hang their hat on is City winning every match from here out.
No draws, no losses. Seven wins. No margin for error.
I don't think I said that.So Orlando losing to Revs is a preferred outcome.
Which makes no sense. There's a snowflake chance in hell we get Montreal's spot if Orlando isn't in the way. There's no chance we get Revs spot.I don't think I said that.
In fact, Orlando beating the Revs would have been a preferred outcome.