Upcoming Focus Group

Yeah... maybe misdirection to make people THINK it was something big?

Maybe not to leak marketing tactics to another club?
On reflection I would guess that the NDA might be something required by the consultants who ran and/or designed the focus group. They could consider their work product proprietary.
 
Last edited:
On reflection I would guess that the NDA might be something required by the consultants who ran and/or designed the focus group. They could consider their work product proprietary.
Possibly. But in my experience it is way more likely that people overcomplicate until the point of ridiculous. If the Peter Principle represents the tendency for people to be promoted up to one step past where they are competent. There must be a principle for the tendency for red tape (e.g., legal documents, HR processes and forms) to be created up to a point of equilibrium where there is a tightrope thin balance between progress and stand still.

Prize goes to the best name anyone can offer for this principle.
 
Possibly. But in my experience it is way more likely that people overcomplicate until the point of ridiculous. If the Peter Principle represents the tendency for people to be promoted up to one step past where they are competent. There must be a principle for the tendency for red tape (e.g., legal documents, HR processes and forms) to be created up to a point of equilibrium where there is a tightrope thin balance between progress and stand still.

Prize goes to the best name anyone can offer for this principle.
In government it's called regulatory equilibrium.
 
Possibly. But in my experience it is way more likely that people overcomplicate until the point of ridiculous. If the Peter Principle represents the tendency for people to be promoted up to one step past where they are competent. There must be a principle for the tendency for red tape (e.g., legal documents, HR processes and forms) to be created up to a point of equilibrium where there is a tightrope thin balance between progress and stand still.

Prize goes to the best name anyone can offer for this principle.
Parking the Bus.
 
Possibly. But in my experience it is way more likely that people overcomplicate until the point of ridiculous. If the Peter Principle represents the tendency for people to be promoted up to one step past where they are competent. There must be a principle for the tendency for red tape (e.g., legal documents, HR processes and forms) to be created up to a point of equilibrium where there is a tightrope thin balance between progress and stand still.

Prize goes to the best name anyone can offer for this principle.
Advancing Purgatory
 
They already did that with the stadium survey before the season started.

I would imagine that a lot of the questions may ultimately relate to a new stadium. For example, they could be trying to figure out how much they can get away with charging as a way to justify the investment in a stadium.
 
Just got an email about a new focus group. They're paying $125 for 90min but the time is from 9am to 5pm. So if you're a student or have a free day during the week go have your voice heard.
 
Just got an email about a new focus group. They're paying $125 for 90min but the time is from 9am to 5pm. So if you're a student or have a free day during the week go have your voice heard.

"We understand the chicken buckets have been a huge hit here at the stadium. We are looking to have that success extended to all of our food options here, so our question is: if we put this cold, inexplicably crunchy Johnny Rockets burger from last week into a bucket, do you think that would be a hit as well?"
 
Last edited:
Just got an email about a new focus group. They're paying $125 for 90min but the time is from 9am to 5pm. So if you're a student or have a free day during the week go have your voice heard.

who sent the email? i didnt get anything.... i only heard about this because of all the crap RBNJ fans are saying on twitter
 
Back
Top