But "modern Hollywood" has very little in the way of an identifiable aesthetic.
Art Deco is present all over LA, by the way; not just in Hollywood. I think it's a good use of the style.
Totally agree. I've been wanting an NYCFC baseball jacket like that since the beginning.That merchandise is sweet! Hope the jerseys are as good looking as the merchandise. I'd buy that hat and Golazo shirt if I lived in LA
Predominantly gold home shirts don't create a pretty picture in my mind's eye. Black on the road might be cool, though.
It looks amazing in actual gold.
I also have a "meh" reaction, which is a bit odd because I love art Deco and 1920s and 1930s iconography. I also love clean uncluttered looks, which this is. So I can't figure out why it leaves me flat. Perhaps the gold/black combo, and the particular shade of gold. In truth I have nothing bad to say about it; it just doesn't do it. But what counts is how LA reacts.
I'm kind of getting into art deco myself (in a very small way) but I share your lack of enthusiasm. I think the reason for me is simply because I don't think sports teams suit art deco. They are just not in any way a natural fit.
I think it depends on the context of the surrounding culture. I know not everyone's a Third Rail member (or fan) here, but I'd challenge anyone to say that Wolff's callback to New York's art deco high period through the logo wasn't an inspired design at least.
I saw Dorados of the Mexican League play tonight. They have gold and black kits and it didn't look too bad.
I cannot stand when a team jersey looks like a billboard of advertisements.Why don't you put up a picture of the one that's not so bad. This is really bad.
Libertadores and CCL must drive you nuts.I cannot stand when a team jersey looks like a billboard of advertisements.
Unfortunately not every team across the globe is sponsored by ethiad or emirates or some other company who can afford to pay their operating costs or some ungodly amount of money for a spot on the kit.I cannot stand when a team jersey looks like a billboard of advertisements.
There's a tasteful way to display multiple sponsors so that the jersey doesn't look like a Nascar frame from the 80's, and then there's the south/central American football club way of doing it which does not include having a graphic designer on staff.Unfortunately not every team across the globe is sponsored by ethiad or emirates or some other company who can afford to pay their operating costs or some ungodly amount of money for a spot on the kit.
The majority of central and South American teams can barely afford their own operating costs. I think that it's the fault of the kit brand for pushing out cruddy jerseys. If they cared I'm sure they could find a way to add those sponsors on in a presentable manner.There's a tasteful way to display multiple sponsors so that the jersey doesn't look like a Nascar frame from the 80's, and then there's the south/central American football club way of doing it which does not include having a graphic designer on staff.
Those teams barely being able to afford their operating costs doesn't sway me - for them (or any team) the key is marketing, and if you have an unattractive product, then that's on them for whatever the reason.The majority of central and South American teams can barely afford their own operating costs. I think that it's the fault of the kit brand for pushing out cruddy jerseys. If they cared I'm sure they could find a way to add those sponsors on in a presentable manner.