Yah. After Villa almost took his head off when he kicked the ball at him at the end of the first half, Steffan had his number.But he ended up saving the PK at the end of the game...so who's in who's head now?
Yah. After Villa almost took his head off when he kicked the ball at him at the end of the first half, Steffan had his number.But he ended up saving the PK at the end of the game...so who's in who's head now?
Concacaf badHouston’s field looks worse than shit.
Vila is still in control, because as you noted, Villa strategically missed it on purpose (according to Ring).But he ended up saving the PK at the end of the game...so who's in who's head now?
Home field advantage when you employ half ofConcacaf bad
Villa setting him up with the long conBut he ended up saving the PK at the end of the game...so who's in who's head now?
Villa wanted to raise his confidence so he could be amazing vs AtlantaVila is still in control, because as you noted, Villa strategically missed it on purpose (according to Ring).![]()
So his entire brilliant scheme is for naught since Columbus won?!?!?! Oh noes!Villa wanted to raise his confidence so he could be amazing vs Atlanta
<tin foil hat> Atlanta has been the MLS darling all year and that 70k seat stadium was a broadcast selling point..... the math is easyI know it was alluded to earlier in this thread, but that Columbus goal called back was clearly onsides, right?
And then later, the cross from Manneh to Kamara that Guzan saved was onsides as well, right? This one wouldn't have mattered as much as Guzan grabbed it, but the refs seemed awfully quick to raise the flag on Columbus last night IMO.
That, and they had 3 DPs all year, subject to some injuries.We had about 1.8 DPs in 2015. Villa = 1, Pirlo =0.5, Lampard 0.3 (all based on availability, not quality).Something that I was thinking about yesterday while watching the match that might need to go in another thread...
There's been a lot of talk about how Atlanta came in and their strategy with their DPs, and how they were able to put together a quality roster immediately. While they did do great with their DPs, I'm not certain that that is the biggest reason they found such immediate success. I look more towards their other signings they were able to put together. More specifically, their wins at:
Compare those guys with our other support players our first year: Nemec, Mix (how he was played argument aside), Khiry, who else? Now I know Atlanta had a bit of an advantage in their Year 1 versus our Year 1 in terms of GAM/TAM availability, but their ability to get great production out of those signings to me was more important to their success this year than the quality of their DPs.
- Yamil Asad
- Gonzalez-Pirez
- Greg Garza
- Julian Gressel (yes, I know this was a draft pick)
Why are you unhappy about building a team around Wingert and Grabavoy?Something that I was thinking about yesterday while watching the match that might need to go in another thread...
There's been a lot of talk about how Atlanta came in and their strategy with their DPs, and how they were able to put together a quality roster immediately. While they did do great with their DPs, I'm not certain that that is the biggest reason they found such immediate success. I look more towards their other signings they were able to put together. More specifically, their wins at:
Compare those guys with our other support players our first year: Nemec, Mix (how he was played argument aside), Khiry, who else? Now I know Atlanta had a bit of an advantage in their Year 1 versus our Year 1 in terms of GAM/TAM availability, but their ability to get great production out of those signings to me was more important to their success this year than the quality of their DPs.
- Yamil Asad
- Gonzalez-Pirez
- Greg Garza
- Julian Gressel (yes, I know this was a draft pick)
That's all true, but you really can't discount how good their DP signings were.Something that I was thinking about yesterday while watching the match that might need to go in another thread...
There's been a lot of talk about how Atlanta came in and their strategy with their DPs, and how they were able to put together a quality roster immediately. While they did do great with their DPs, I'm not certain that that is the biggest reason they found such immediate success. I look more towards their other signings they were able to put together. More specifically, their wins at:
Compare those guys with our other support players our first year: Nemec, Mix (how he was played argument aside), Khiry, who else? Now I know Atlanta had a bit of an advantage in their Year 1 versus our Year 1 in terms of GAM/TAM availability, but their ability to get great production out of those signings to me was more important to their success this year than the quality of their DPs.
- Yamil Asad
- Gonzalez-Pirez
- Greg Garza
- Julian Gressel (yes, I know this was a draft pick)
Thought we actually had a chance at watching a playoff game at AvayaHas anyone heard from SFphoto since the Quakes game? Plz send proof of life.
I might be overthinking this but Tata might be trying to absorb the blame so the players don't get hammered by the press.
Is this weird? How much does practicing help for a PK shootout? And when Tata says they "didn't talk about it" does that also mean they didn't talk about who was going to be taking the PKs? Cause I thought Atlanta's picks for who was taking them seemed odd
I think that tweet overplays the importance.
Is this weird? How much does practicing help for a PK shootout? And when Tata says they "didn't talk about it" does that also mean they didn't talk about who was going to be taking the PKs? Cause I thought Atlanta's picks for who was taking them seemed odd