What was the tweet? My system security blocks the widget.
Sent at 7:20pm last night:
"I hear you loud and clear."
What was the tweet? My system security blocks the widget.
I have no doubt about their commitment to the project—investing in the stadium is clear evidence of that. I'm confident we’ll open the stadium with a lineup that boasts big-name stars and a strong roster, much like they aimed to do when founding the club.
However, putting aside the narratives and speculation, and focusing solely on our current roster, we are far from being one of the league’s more ambitious teams. Our Designated Players (DPs) are not game-changers and barely exceed the salary threshold to qualify as DPs, which feels like cutting corners. Meanwhile, our U22 slots have been used on raw talents who arrived at least a year away from being MLS-ready.
The current roster construction does not align with the ambitious goals they outlined at the end of last season. If the club truly intends to compete for trophies every year as they claimed in the emails at the end of last season, it’s time to back those ambitions with decisive action and sign genuine difference-makers. Otherwise, the rhetoric needs to match the reality. We can remain optimistic about the future and supportive of the team while still holding the decision-makers accountable when their choices fall short.
Again, fair enough. But of course, our gaffer just got fired. It could well be due to the F/O believing the roster was constructed to compete today, and we failed to do it. We just don't know if they're right because the guys we signed just didn't play enough.I have no doubt about their commitment to the project—investing in the stadium is clear evidence of that. I'm confident we’ll open the stadium with a lineup that boasts big-name stars and a strong roster, much like they aimed to do when founding the club.
However, putting aside the narratives and speculation, and focusing solely on our current roster, we are far from being one of the league’s more ambitious teams. Our Designated Players (DPs) are not game-changers and barely exceed the salary threshold to qualify as DPs, which feels like cutting corners. Meanwhile, our U22 slots have been used on raw talents who arrived at least a year away from being MLS-ready.
The current roster construction does not align with the ambitious goals they outlined at the end of last season. If the club truly intends to compete for trophies every year as they claimed in the emails at the end of last season, it’s time to back those ambitions with decisive action and sign genuine difference-makers. Otherwise, the rhetoric needs to match the reality. We can remain optimistic about the future and supportive of the team while still holding the decision-makers accountable when their choices fall short.
I'm assuming that was from Claure. Very interesting.Sent at 7:20pm last night:
"I hear you loud and clear."
One of my favorite bits of psychological research (partly because wifey took a class with Dunning), quoting Wikipedia:The owner is unlikely to have a firm understanding of the sport, so he empowers people smarter than him to run the sporting side. The owner hopefully enjoys watching the sport, but isn't nearly knowledgeable enough in the Xs and Os to actually have a meaningful role in that side of the business.
Spending $20 million on young players that fit the MLS budget rules and our choice of U22s.We spent $20 million last winter on additions and improvements to the roster. That's very ambitious.
However, we are spending on the wrong players. I believe the scouts and CFG people thought these three players would be good enough to help immediately. Ultimately, I think MLS is improving and changing faster than CFG realizes, causing them to make mistakes in scouting.
Lee has been with the team since 2014. Sporting director since 2019. Whatever credit you want to give to Reyna, Lee was heavily involved since team inception through the 2021 Cup win.What success did Lee have? He won a cup with a roster 97% build by Claudio and nearly every move he has made since has made us worse.
Spending $20 million on young players that fit the MLS budget rules and our choice of U22s.
Lee has been with the team since 2014. Sporting director since 2019. Whatever credit you want to give to Reyna, Lee was heavily involved since team inception through the 2021 Cup win.
Cushing joined in 2020 as an assistant and took over as caretaker in 2022.
Lee may still depart, especially if this batch of signings fails entirely, but he contributed more to team success and was the one to keep between the two.
Giving him a chance with a new manager and time for these signings is worth the chance. If they fail, though, no issues moving on.
Got to do better FC.
This may be the answer. It's not so much a case of Nick not developing individual players as not developing a team. We never really got to the point where we were truly cohesive, where everyone knew where to go and what to do and where the other guys would be and what they were going to do.Sure RBNJ beat us, but aside from Forsberg, player for player would anyone here trade our roster for theirs?
I think the players were happy, I think they loved playing for Nick. Even last year you saw a team that fought every step of the way.This may be the answer. It's not so much a case of Nick not developing individual players as not developing a team. We never really got to the point where we were truly cohesive, where everyone knew where to go and what to do and where the other guys would be and what they were going to do.
Except against Tigres. We'll always have Tigres.
Which, ironically, may have sealed Nick's fate. It showed how good we could truly be. We weren't that good often enough. Personally, I put it down to the typical issues of a young squad being inconsistent, but maybe there was something deeper going on. Maybe we just weren't a happy ship. And that's always on the captain, not the admiral.
I think the players were happy, I think they loved playing for Nick. Even last year you saw a team that fought every step of the way.
My annoyance with Nick was the lack of improvement among the young players and tactics that, especially for road games, weren't ambitious enough.
The team definitely fought. There was no lack of effort. But the dynamic I'm talking about goes beyond effort, or respecting and liking (or even loving) the coach, or players buying into a system, or any of the things we naturally look at when assessing a team and its leadership. It's kind of this spooky mind meld.I think the players were happy, I think they loved playing for Nick. Even last year you saw a team that fought every step of the way.
My annoyance with Nick was the lack of improvement among the young players and tactics that, especially for road games, weren't ambitious enough.
maybe that was the issue. players loved playing for nick but when push came to shove, did nick get the best out of them? this was the common criticism for berhalter with the USMNT. the players all liked him and liked playing for him, but he was never able to get the full potential out of them.
Since last year I've thought Nick hasn't been getting the best out of the team. Ultimately I believe that's why he was fired. He especially failed with our high-priced young players. I'm surprised it didn't happen last year, but hopefully this is the right time to extract something more out of this group.