I don't hate Spurs. I love making fun of them.It feels like you hate spurs more than city, United , Everton anyone really, just curious why that is ? They seem like mostly likeable over achievers to me .
I
If you recall, I said at the beginning of the year that I thought the top 4 should be nailed on with the 4 teams we're talking about. I may end up being just about right.And just imagine the race if Jose hadn’t screwed up the first half of the season for the team you don’t want to mention!!! OGS has them now playing with more confidence and panache than any of the other clubs, but the deficit was too much for them to overcome to make a real run at it.
Score would have been 5-0 if Aguero hadn't missed that sitter.
I think if a few things fall the right way, ManU is going to catch Spurs. Leicester really blew it today and a more talented team would have taken Spurs to the woodshed. Vardy blew a PK. Brain fart giveaway led to second goal and defender completely misplayed interception which allowed Son to get behind him in own half the field leading to track meet third.If you recall, I said at the beginning of the year that I thought the top 4 should be nailed on with the 4 teams we're talking about. I may end up being just about right.
It got worse.You posted too soon
The XYZ player/team "wanted it more" or "wanted it less" take is one of the laziest ever in sports "analysis". Unfortunately, it's one that's made wayyyyy too often.Guess what? When you have 3 teams on a 90+ point pace this deep in, none of them can be construed as lacking the nerve/talent/heart/bottle/ whatever the fuck. But only one will win the title. And that doesn’t mean anything other than exactly that. One finishes first. It doesn’t mean anyone choked anything away. It actually means we’re looking at several teams that are exactly the opposite of bottlers. They are all full of character and talent.
I'm planning on going in the fall, or maybe next spring, and I figured I'd wear a Man City jersey but an NYCFC baseball hat. Because nobody in England wears baseball hats, apparently. Also thinking of bringing three or four scarves for trading purposes.Going to Manchester City vs Tottenham game on April 20.
Would it be weird to wear my NYCFC jersey?
I'm planning on going in the fall, or maybe next spring, and I figured I'd wear a Man City jersey but an NYCFC baseball hat. Because nobody in England wears baseball hats, apparently. Also thinking of bringing three or four scarves for trading purposes.
I figure I'd get more interest and less abuse with a Man City jersey even if I was obviously American and an NYCFC fan as well. Not that that's based on any facts or anything, just what I figured I'd do.
I was wearing my NYCFC scarf in London a couple years ago when a guy started to sort of abuse me for wearing a CITEH scarf in London I showed him it was New York and Not Manchester and he quickly changed his tune giving me props for supporting my local American side instead.
Know we've got Everton fans on here. What's the deal with your boys drawing Liverpool and beating Chelski but losing to NewCastle? Only get up for the big teams?
Soccer is a high-variance sport.. What's the deal with your boys drawing Liverpool and beating Chelski but losing to NewCastle? Only get up for the big teams?
Interesting. I wonder how much of this is due to England making a concerted effort a few years back after the WC to focus on their academies and requiring academy-grown players to get roster spots? Would guess directly related and evidently their strategy is paying dividends.Interesting article by Rory Smith about how German teams are scouting all over the English academies because they are turning out more talent than the German academies.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/23/sports/jason-sancho-bundesliga.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share
Not exclusive of what you're saying, but there are a few theories in there. One is the sheer amount of money in the English game means better academy infrastructure and probably more extensive scouting too.Interesting. I wonder how much of this is due to England making a concerted effort a few years back after the WC to focus on their academies and requiring academy-grown players to get roster spots? Would guess directly related and evidently their strategy is paying dividends.
Youth-specific meaning not playing up in age/level?Not exclusive of what you're saying, but there are a few theories in there. One is the sheer amount of money in the English game means better academy infrastructure and probably more extensive scouting too.
I was interested to see that they also suggest that playing in youth-specific leagues is better for development. Pep himself has implied the opposite.
Yeah in Germany and Spain the big clubs have B teams in lower divisions. So they play against teams who are trying to win, against full grown men who have learnt to make up for deficits in natural talent or athletic ability with gamesmanship and skill in the dark arts.Youth-specific meaning not playing up in age/level?