Thanks for sharing.
My rep hinted at that about a week ago when I signaled my displeasure. Fairly, it does alleviate some issues. But my mantra as an attorney is "If it isn't in writing it doesn't exist." Also, as I wrote back, "Have you never met someone who processes information best alone, in written form?" I don't want to be fed info like this on a call while I need to take notes. Rep also said they used the same process at his previous job at Charlotte FC. I told him I'm glad that worked for you.
I can't quote a quote so:
“additional details around investment levels, term lengths and agreement language . . . ”
1. Unless I can reasonably expect to end up with more money than I put in it's not an investment. I so hate that term when applied to a consumer transaction. It's manipulative in a manner that's so obvious it's insulting. Expensive =/= investment. It's the opposite.
2. "Term lengths and agreement language" strongly suggest these seating choices either must be or will have an option for a multi-year commitment. If a 1-year option is available it will probably be much more expensive. I remember this being part of the Gatsby and Tunnel etc group of clubs. I wonder how far down this multi-year feature will go. WiIl some, most, or all regular non-hospitality seats also be like this? It basically sounds like a way for the team to accomplish some of the things a Personal Seat License gives them under a method different enough that they can honestly deny they have PSLs.
