One of the bummers about our schedule is that New England, San Jose and Colorado have gone from dumpster fires to some of the hottest teams in the league, and we have yet to play any of them.
I can really only somewhat agree with Colorado.
San Jose was only bad for six (arguably only 4 and maybe not even that*) games this year before turning it around.
We never do well against New England no matter what. And I still do not think they're that good. If we disappoint again this year I won't blame the schedule.
Colorado was bad for 11 games. Would have been nice to play them then but that's still only 1/3 of a season. But it was enough that a bit of good scheduling luck would have helped.
But there's also some less obvious ones.
We played Toronto when they had Jozy and Bradley and before a big downswing, and now both are back before we play them again.
We didn't play RBNY While Kemar Lawrence and BWP were out for extended times and they are both back.
It's conceivable Pity starts clicking and Atlanta plays better by the time we finally play them.
On the plus side we did get to play Columbus in a 14 game sequence in which the Crew earned only 4 points (but we gave them one of the four).
I worried Cincinnati would get better with a new coach and before we get our 2 games but that didn't happen.
We caught Seattle in a slump and without several starters.
We play(ed) most of the best of the West -- LAFC, Seattle, Portland and SJ -- at home.
IF DC ever turns themselves around we will be happy to have played them 2x in the first half of the season.
Really I think the worst part of our schedule is we still have to play 16 games in 12 weeks (after tomorrow), on top of the busy 2 weeks finishing up.
* SJ won Game 5 and lost Game 6 in Houston where the home team gets 2+ PPG, then went 11 games with 1 loss. Of their 4 opening losses 1 was in RBA and another was home to LAFC, neither of which is indicative of disfunction. They really were not bad for any meaningful amount of time this year.