Fixing The Ccl

sbrylski

Registered
Apr 24, 2014
4,183
10,869
303
The group stage of the CCL kinda sucks. Groups of three, no significant play between MLS teams and Liga MX, and a bunch of teams involved that don't really deserve to be there in their quality and infrastructure. I want to see qualifying rounds to weed out some of the bottom feeders and fewer teams in four-team groups to make the group stage meaningful.

Group stage would be 16 teams in four groups of four. There would be 12 automatic qualifiers. The remaining four teams go through a three round qualification ladder. Allocation is as follows:

Code:
Country/League    Automatic  Qualifiers
----------------  ---------  ----------

MLS*                  2           1
United States**                   1
Canada***             1

Liga MX               4           2
Central Nation 2      2           1
Central Nation 3      1           2
Central Nation 4      1           1
Central Nation 5                  2
Central Nation 6                  2
Central Nation 7                  1
Central Nation 8                  1

Carribean             1           2

                  ---------  ----------
          Total:     12          16


*MLS Cup, Supporter Shield Winner Automatic, Next Best Qualifies
**US Open Cup Qualifies
***Canadian Championship Qualifies

The tournament would then be played as follows:

Qualifying Round 1: Bottom 8 qualifying teams randomly drawn to play a h2h (Lowest from each Central 2-7 and Caribbean)
Qualifying Round 2: Next four qualifying teams are randomly drawn to play a winner from Round 1 (Highest from each Central 3, 5, 6, and Caribbean)
Qualifying Round 3: Top 4 qualifying teams are randomly drawn to play a winner from Round 2 (One from MLS, one from US Open, Two from Liga MX)
Group Stage: 12 Automatic qualifiers are put into four pots and drawn into four groups, no more than two teams from one country per group

Most years, the group stage would have about 5-6 Liga MX teams and 4-5 MLS teams. How much more fun would a groups such as this be?

Code:
Group A
-------
New York Red Bulls   (USA)
Cruz Azul            (Mexico)
Montreal Impact      (Canada)
Comunicaciones       (Guatemala)

Group B
-------
Santos Laguna        (Mexico)
D.C. United          (USA)
Saprissa             (Costa Rica)
Olimpia              (Honduras)


Group C
-------
Sporting Kansas City (USA)
Leon                 (Mexico)
Pachuca              (Mexico)
Bayamon              (Puerto Rico)

Group D
-------
America              (Mexico)
Portland Timbers     (USA)
Alajuelense          (Costa Rica)
Tauro                (Panama)

Group stage is broken and doesn't promote a meaningful competition. I think the above method would make things a lot more interesting and competitive, and allow the MLS and Liga MX to play more games against each other.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:

NYCFCFan10

Registered
Mar 23, 2014
2,476
2,408
243
Here I'll fix it:

Kick out all CONCACAF clubs not from USA, Canada or Mexico. Add more clubs from Mexico, USA, Canada, and call it "Superliga"

Fixed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CP_Scouse

NYCFCFan10

Registered
Mar 23, 2014
2,476
2,408
243
Btw, I hate when I bring up SuperLiga and people go "Oh that sucked!"

Yes, it did suck... way back in 2007. We're not hopping in a time machine and going back to then when Mexican clubs were infinitely better than MLS clubs and the games were played in near empty stadiums.

The SuperLiga logo was awesome:

superliga.jpg
 

Falastur

Registered
Donor
Seasoned Supporter
Mar 20, 2014
3,389
4,580
353
35
Herts, UK
I'm torn on this. I think that there is a certain romance to cup competitions where small teams get to play with the big boys. However, it's undeniable that seeding the stronger teams and making weaker teams compete for the right to play them does generally help the competitions.