IFAB Proposed Rule Changes includes a 60 Minute Clock

I actually like the no rebounds on PK idea. Of course I'm sure in the moment we or MCFC or L'OM or whoever else I support score one I take it without complaint but it does seem kind of cheap. Saving a PK is ridiculously hard as it is. Most of the rest of these I don't care for.

The other rule I'd change (which is only a rule that applies to some competitions ) is no Away goals rule in Extra time. It's super cheap that the team that's away in the second leg (in some knock out competitions ) can be afforded an extra 30 minutes to get an away goal that the other team did not.
 
Davo15 said:
I actually like the no rebounds on PK idea. Of course I'm sure in the moment we or MCFC or L'OM or whoever else I support score one I take it without complaint but it does seem kind of cheap. Saving a PK is ridiculously hard as it is. Most of the rest of these I don't care for.

The other rule I'd change (which is only a rule that applies to some competitions ) is no Away goals rule in Extra time. It's super cheap that the team that's away in the second leg (in some knock out competitions ) can be afforded an extra 30 minutes to get an away goal that the other team did not.
Click to expand...

It's already the case that Away goals don't count in extra time.
 
Joseph Bianco said:
It doesnt exist in extra time because it doesnt really make sense. Away goals is a tie breaker. If youre tied, you go to extra time, if someone has the tie breaker they win before extra time.
Click to expand...
No.
You can be tied after 180 minutes, including AGR, and still apply AGR (or not) in extra time.
Game 1 Team A wins 2-1 at home
Game 2 Team B wins 2-1 at home
Aggregate 3-3
Away Goals 1-1
Play an extra 30 minutes. Both teams score once. If you apply AGR then the Away team in Game 2 wins (if no AGR then kicks). It can logically work. But as Davo15 pointed out it's unfair because the Away team in the second game gets an extra 30 minutes to score Away goals, which is why some leagues don't use it. The counter argument is anything is better than going to kicks. I side with Davo here.
 
mgarbowski said:
No.
You can be tied after 180 minutes, including AGR, and still apply AGR (or not) in extra time.
Game 1 Team A wins 2-1 at home
Game 2 Team B wins 2-1 at home
Aggregate 3-3
Away Goals 1-1
Play an extra 30 minutes. Both teams score once. If you apply AGR then the Away team in Game 2 wins (if no AGR then kicks). It can logically work. But as Davo15 pointed out it's unfair because the Away team in the second game gets an extra 30 minutes to score Away goals, which is why some leagues don't use it. The counter argument is anything is better than going to kicks. I side with Davo here.
Click to expand...

exactly, so it doesnt make sense.

Theres nothing to side with, the rule hes saying he doesnt like doesnt exist.
 
Come on, no support on here for the Van Basten proposed orange card and resulting 10-minute penalty, or the old-school MLS run-up 35 yard penalty kicks?!?
 
JayH said:
Come on, no support on here for the Van Basten proposed orange card and resulting 10-minute penalty, or the old-school MLS run-up 35 yard penalty kicks?!?
Click to expand...
MLS SHOOTOUTS NEED TO BE A THING AGAIN!!!!
 
SoupInNYC said:
Ok, this took me about 2 minutes now:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Away_goals_rule
https://www.si.com/planet-futbol/2017/03/07/champions-league-extra-time-rules
http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles.../Regulations/02/35/87/89/2358789_DOWNLOAD.pdf

Take your pick
Click to expand...

this also took me about 2 minutes... so ummm i guess you can admit youre wrong now

ljmbPSt.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top