Bad things happen when you don't play your Americans.Unused substitute today in a 3-3 draw with Ross County. This isn’t helping anyone so far.
Bad things happen when you don't play your Americans.Unused substitute today in a 3-3 draw with Ross County. This isn’t helping anyone so far.
I haven't seen that his play has been sub par. I watched a good bit of the first game, and he looked solid. Not sure about mid week.Had another rough run out mid-week against Livingston. Not a great start.
I use an app called sofascore which has really details statistics on players and teams (it's pretty cool) and they've been giving sands middle of the pack scores in the two games he played. I haven't had a chance to watch thoI haven't seen that his play has been sub par. I watched a good bit of the first game, and he looked solid. Not sure about mid week.
Part of the issue this week is that Joe Aribo returned from international duty in Africa and slotted back into the midfield.
I use an app called sofascore which has really details statistics on players and teams (it's pretty cool) and they've been giving sands middle of the pack scores in the two games he played. I haven't had a chance to watch tho
I am only basing it on some of the reports and player ratings after the Livingston game, which were very critical and mostly 4s. I am hopeful they were overly critical or biased but was hoping to see some better reviews. It’s also early and far too early to judge so I am looking forward to better days.I haven't seen that his play has been sub par. I watched a good bit of the first game, and he looked solid. Not sure about mid week.
Part of the issue this week is that Joe Aribo returned from international duty in Africa and slotted back into the midfield.
Forget about the questionable merits of a loan for the club, unfortunately the move is also hurting his own prospects of both call-ups and first tier aspirations. I hope that this takes a turn somehow.
Based upon what I had read, in his first run out he was shaky at times but not terrible, and some of it was as expected in a first game with a new club. I know many NYCFC supporters watched some of that and didn't think he looked out of place. However, the reports of the next game against Livingston suggested that he was really poor and overmatched (and was pulled in the 59th min). His ratings by various pubs (for whatever those are worth) had his play mostly at around a 4. I haven't seen any of the more precise tactical/statistical summaries of his play, but at least the eye tests were that he's not a starter. It seemed that they did give him an immediate try and then quickly pulled the plug. I wonder if that was a poor/unfair approach and he should have been allowed to assimilate/learn before making the 11.18 months ...
from starting, key cog in a championship team to unused bench player... definitely not what the club or sands wanted.
i'm curious what's going on? he did start and get minutes right away and then dropped off the map.
can't imagine ramsay coming in was the entire reason.
Based upon what I had read, in his first run out he was shaky at times but not terrible, and some of it was as expected in a first game with a new club. I know many NYCFC supporters watched some of that and didn't think he looked out of place. However, the reports of the next game against Livingston suggested that he was really poor and overmatched. His ratings by various pubs (for whatever those are worth) had his play mostly at around a 4. I haven't seen any of the more precise tactical/statistical summaries of his play, but at least the eye tests were that he's not a starter. It seemed that they did give him an immediate try and then quickly pulled the plug. I wonder if that was a poor/unfair approach and he should have been allowed to assimilate/learn before making the 11.
It's been a month. There are 17 months left in this loan -- let's give the guy (and Rangers) a chance. They are in a title fight right now and shoehorning a young player into a championship fight isn't the right thing for the player or for the team. Give him a chance to get some time with this team, hopefully next year they can get him in more.
This is why, frankly, an 18-month loan is better than a 6-month loan. Look at our history of signing players midseason, not playing well, then they come storming into a starring role during their first full season here. This isn't unusual.
An 18-month loan is also better than a straight up transfer followed by paying $675K to get the rights to take him back.This is why, frankly, an 18-month loan is better than a 6-month loan. Look at our history of signing players midseason, not playing well, then they come storming into a starring role during their first full season here. This isn't unusual.
It's been a month. There are 17 months left in this loan -- let's give the guy (and Rangers) a chance. They are in a title fight right now and shoehorning a young player into a championship fight isn't the right thing for the player or for the team. Give him a chance to get some time with this team, hopefully next year they can get him in more.
This is why, frankly, an 18-month loan is better than a 6-month loan. Look at our history of signing players midseason, not playing well, then they come storming into a starring role during their first full season here. This isn't unusual.
It's been a month. There are 17 months left in this loan -- let's give the guy (and Rangers) a chance. They are in a title fight right now and shoehorning a young player into a championship fight isn't the right thing for the player or for the team. Give him a chance to get some time with this team, hopefully next year they can get him in more.
This is why, frankly, an 18-month loan is better than a 6-month loan. Look at our history of signing players midseason, not playing well, then they come storming into a starring role during their first full season here. This isn't unusual.
You kind of make my point. It takes a bit of time for a player and club to fit perfectly. My point was that Sands HAD to go right to Rangers and impress right away to have a shot at Qatar and his ultimate maximum potential value. If he starts to make an impact over there in August, will be have enough time to get back into the national team picture? No. Only a forward who starts scoring a ton of goals can move back in that late.It's been a month. There are 17 months left in this loan -- let's give the guy (and Rangers) a chance. They are in a title fight right now and shoehorning a young player into a championship fight isn't the right thing for the player or for the team. Give him a chance to get some time with this team, hopefully next year they can get him in more.
This is why, frankly, an 18-month loan is better than a 6-month loan. Look at our history of signing players midseason, not playing well, then they come storming into a starring role during their first full season here. This isn't unusual.
Alternatively we could have just....kept him here until the summer?
Right now this is a bad deal for all parties.
It was just a cup game but all reports suggest that he played well today in an easy 3-0 win. He started at center back and then shifted into MF later in the game. I am glad he got some minutes, showed his versatility and hopefully built some confidence.