First, breaking up play isnt the same as an interception. What DM doesn't have a yellow card accumulation suspension for professional fouls to break up counters? AJ was never in position to even do that. Think about it, he was so far out of position he couldn't give a late challenge. Meanwhile, Mix was chasing back from whatever wing he was stupidly stuck at, and still had more of a defensive impact than Jacobson. I don't need stats. I have my own eyes.If you want to go on stats Mix had Very similar stats To......Ned Grabavoy.
While I think stats do not tell the full tale, and I don't truly think Ned was/is more talented than Mix, it is tough to call Mix a clear "superior player" to many others last year.
As for Jacobson: he averaged 1.9 int per game
8/13 vs DC - 2
7/26 vs Orl - 3
9/16 vs Tor - 2
9/19 vs SJ - 2
4/19 vs Por -3
These are just a few home games that I bothered to look up. I know he had a road game with at least 4.
Mix averaged 1.1 int per game and in his one game as DM he had 1 int versus Seattle.
Also, I find it telling that Mix was never thought of as a DM by any manager or analyst. It just seems like more square peg, round hole and that suits nobody.
Alas, I think AJ is more a box to box player but I also think between him and Mix at DM he is the better choice. However as some have pointed out this question probably is not best answered between 2 players, it is really a formation, style of play issue.
If you think Mix isn't clearly superior as a player, then we probably shouldn't discuss this anymore. One guy has many solid to very good national team performances, including goals and clutch, critical contributions to key goals. The other struggled to see time at Staebek. The former got the shaft, the latter was played in his preferred position and still did squat. That's all I need to know.
How is this a discussion? Anyway, for me, it won't be anymore. No need. The world sees Mix as clearly superior. But bang the drum for the journeyman. Dissent is fine. But I think you're misguided here.