MLS logos 2017

Davo15 said:
Ok first I'd probably call them badges..

Of course I think Jersey should be dead last on principal and we should be higher. Not 100 percent saying number one but definitely top 5.

I didn't realize Minnesota are going to wear our colors more or less?


http://www.foxsports.com/soccer/gallery/mls-club-logos-ranking-092116
Click to expand...
Apparently how "bright" ones logo is matters. I do agree that Philly's gold is more of a mustard, but I actually like their badge. Only one I'm really disagreeing with on the list upon first viewing.
 
I really, really like the Minnesota logo and color scheme. I'm trying to convince some of my friends in Wisconsin to join the MLS-hype train and start rooting for Minnesota.

The big disagreement I have is how high Houston is. I honestly think that is one of the worst logos in MLS and should be in the bottom 3 at least. I know its not very high at #14, but it should still be lower than that.
 
What are people's thoughts on the MLS badges (the arm patches)? How is Atlanta's only gold, black, and white? No red?

I don't know why every team has a unique MLS logo for it's kits? Every though MLS does gold stars. I wish the champions would have all gold MLS logo on their kits for the next season.
 
Interesting stuff. I completely disagree about Philly, who have a very good logo. Besides, how can you criticize Philly's colors and then rank Atlanta so high when the two are so similar?

I also think the teams at the very top are not that good. Columbus, DC, Minnesota and Montreal are all good, but not the best.

I actually like ours the best, and I have to say its classic design is one thing that attracted me to the Club early on. Obviously, this person has no idea how iconic that subway look really is.

Orlando is terrific too. Seattle deserves a better ranking. LA and Vancouver deserve to be close to the top.

Mostly, I give the guy credit for getting most of it right - just not the very top.
 
I agree with the gold patches as well. The stars are stupid.

Can't believe Montreal is #1. One of my least favorites in the league. Montreal, Colorado, Seattle and LA all have a weird, 3D look to them and need updated. I've been convincing myself to like the Quakes rebrand since day one, but it's just bad.

My top would be: NYCFC, Orlando, Columbus, Vancouver, Toronto and Portland.
 
Seth said:
Disagree. I like that each team has a little of their own color. Same badge, yet slightly different.

Completely and utterly agree with this. Gold league badges for the champions.
Click to expand...

Then what does irritate me is that almost all teams have a color outside the logo and others have white so it looks blank.
 
SFphoto said:
I agree with the gold patches as well. The stars are stupid.

Can't believe Montreal is #1. One of my least favorites in the league. Montreal, Colorado, Seattle and LA all have a weird, 3D look to them and need updated. I've been convincing myself to like the Quakes rebrand since day one, but it's just bad.

My top would be: NYCFC, Orlando, Columbus, Vancouver, Toronto and Portland.
Click to expand...
Chicago is very iconic and so fitting as an homage to the city's past regarding the great fire & the fire dept, and obviously the team's moniker.
 
Minnesota is nice. Hate to take my own thread off topic but I really hate that we've got two Uniteds coming in at once.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

jaycrewz
If You Want Custom Screen Printing On A Blank Jersey, Go To Upper 90. Heres The Pricing.
Replies
14
Views
1,826
leilanikali420
leilanikali420
Falastur
[Essay] The evolving strategy of CFG
2
Replies
34
Views
6,024
Fake Jew
Fake Jew
Falastur
Q & A With Ian Joy - Answers Now Received (plus Bonus Message)!
2
Replies
22
Views
5,753
LionNYC
LionNYC
Back
Top