The voting is based on a basic 4-4-2 formation. This is in order to keep things simple.
Any questions please ask here!
Any questions please ask here!
I don't like lone striker formationsI'd like to see a 4-4-1-1 or something along the lines of what the US national team plays which is usually a 4-2-3-1
Lone strikers tend to work if you have a dangerous center attacking mid, if we could somehow get someone like Mix I think we could definitely pull it offI don't like lone striker formations
Doesn't Kreis play a 4-1-2-1-2 diamond?
Fair enough, but the number of midfield players we seem to be linked with suggest it may end up in a very narrow formation, at least.Normally yes, but on the Soccer Morning interview he went to great pains to emphasise that they're signing players for how they fit into the team ethic, and the formation will be moulded around the core players they sign first, not the other way around.
If you play a similar style to MCFC the midfielders and full backs will need to be rotated to maintain performance levels, which could explain that. Don't most of the linked mids seem to be DPs though? They might be either/ors rather than a planned group of signings.Fair enough, but the number of midfield players we seem to be linked with suggest it may end up in a very narrow formation, at least.
Yeah that makes sense. I agree for NYC to play like City they'd need marauding fullbacks to provide width, so should be a priority.If you play a similar style to MCFC the midfielders and full backs will need to be rotated to maintain performance levels, which could explain that. Don't most of the linked mids seem to be DPs though? They might be either/ors rather than a planned group of signings.
Boyd if it's Terrance injured today out for 10 weeks.How possible would this XI be and how would you guys feel about it?
Well, it's not real, it's just an estimate based on rumors and potentially available players (2+2 cenarios)Is just for fantasy or real?
Who is Angelino and Ephraim? Brovsky is a natural LB not RB.