Stadium Discussion

Where Do You Want The Stadium?

  • Manhattan

    Votes: 54 16.6%
  • Queens

    Votes: 99 30.5%
  • Brooklyn

    Votes: 19 5.8%
  • Staten Island

    Votes: 7 2.2%
  • Westchester

    Votes: 18 5.5%
  • The Bronx

    Votes: 113 34.8%
  • Long Island

    Votes: 7 2.2%
  • Dual-Boroughs

    Votes: 3 0.9%
  • Etihad Island

    Votes: 5 1.5%

  • Total voters
    325
I mean, we will know eventually. But carry on being above the fray.
I’m in the argument. I’m not above the fray. We have no concrete evidence that this is happening or not happening.

Taking in the information available at the moment and weighing the construction feasibility it is highly unlikely that the stadium would be built at that location.
 
So when information leaks that’s wasn’t meant to, some orgs own up to it and others deflect. Somebody mentioned somewhere that this was supposedly done beginning of this year/end of last year. That’s really not that long ago in the scheme of the stadium search, so while it’s totally believable that they’ve moved on, it’s also believable that they’re spinning the leak.

I don’t know, but the twitter confirmation from Roberto A’s “reliable source” isn’t enough to actually shut the door. I mean, hell, this source was holding out on this outdated info, having never leaked it even though it’s not supposedly in play, and only when pushed for a response to the leak says it’s old news. Considering how much fans want confirmation of stadium progress, this could have easily been leaked/reported long ago as a sign of good faith by the club - but it wasn’t.

Honestly, it’s not a tin foil hat, but I have no reason to believe Roberto A. I’m also not banking on this being the holy grail design. Since it has been confirmed by multiple people’s sources as being legit, then until the club publicly rules it out/announces another location, it’s still in play.
 
So when information leaks that’s wasn’t meant to, some orgs own up to it and others deflect. Somebody mentioned somewhere that this was supposedly done beginning of this year/end of last year. That’s really not that long ago in the scheme of the stadium search, so while it’s totally believable that they’ve moved on, it’s also believable that they’re spinning the leak.

I don’t know, but the twitter confirmation from Roberto A’s “reliable source” isn’t enough to actually shut the door. I mean, hell, this source was holding out on this outdated info, having never leaked it even though it’s not supposedly in play, and only when pushed for a response to the leak says it’s old news. Considering how much fans want confirmation of stadium progress, this could have easily been leaked/reported long ago as a sign of good faith by the club - but it wasn’t.

Honestly, it’s not a tin foil hat, but I have no reason to believe Roberto A. I’m also not banking on this being the holy grail design. Since it has been confirmed by multiple people’s sources as being legit, then until the club publicly rules it out/announces another location, it’s still in play.
Really. An anonymous off the record source debunks an unsourced jpg posted by an pseudonymous forum poster.
It’s fucking thin on both sides, but no reason to take the anonymous source as verified truth.
 
So when information leaks that’s wasn’t meant to, some orgs own up to it and others deflect. Somebody mentioned somewhere that this was supposedly done beginning of this year/end of last year. That’s really not that long ago in the scheme of the stadium search, so while it’s totally believable that they’ve moved on, it’s also believable that they’re spinning the leak.

I don’t know, but the twitter confirmation from Roberto A’s “reliable source” isn’t enough to actually shut the door. I mean, hell, this source was holding out on this outdated info, having never leaked it even though it’s not supposedly in play, and only when pushed for a response to the leak says it’s old news. Considering how much fans want confirmation of stadium progress, this could have easily been leaked/reported long ago as a sign of good faith by the club - but it wasn’t.

Honestly, it’s not a tin foil hat, but I have no reason to believe Roberto A. I’m also not banking on this being the holy grail design. Since it has been confirmed by multiple people’s sources as being legit, then until the club publicly rules it out/announces another location, it’s still in play.

XQh0iYZxSSWjGeXMmPjo_Confused Larry David.gif


Somebody just tell me what to feel right now!
 
Really. An anonymous off the record source debunks an unsourced jpg posted by an pseudonymous forum poster.
It’s fucking thin on both sides, but no reason to take the anonymous source as verified truth.
Huh?

If enough people have sources that confirm it is real -as in a real concept proposed by the club- then that’s got double/triple confirmation whether anonymously sourced or not.... unless they all have the same source.

But only one person has said its dead in the water and old news. Maybe it is and maybe it isn’t, but in the would of information and leads, a single source of info that can’t be corroborated is just drifting in the wind.
 
Xz3ppju.gif
 
Huh?

If enough people have sources that confirm it is real -as in a real concept proposed by the club- then that’s got double/triple confirmation whether anonymously sourced or not.... unless they all have the same source.

But only one person has said its dead in the water and old news. Maybe it is and maybe it isn’t, but in the would of information and leads, a single source of info that can’t be corroborated is just drifting in the wind.
How do you not just accept that I agreed with you on my conclusion?
 
How do you not just accept that I agreed with you on my conclusion?
Haha because your first word “really” is exactly the word I expect from you when you joust and I assumed you accidentally used a period instead of a question mark. Reread your response with that question mark and you’ll understand why I took you to be disagreeing with me.
 
Haha because your first word “really” is exactly the word I expect from you when you joust and I assumed you accidentally used a period instead of a question mark. Reread your response with that question mark and you’ll understand why I took you to be disagreeing with me.
Really, you tend to presume everyone is disagreeing with you.(?)