Overhyped like how Pirlo was overhyped by fans?he wasnt taking the league by storm by any means... he was a slightly above average MLS player at most. Did he have room for growth sure, but I personally think he was way over hyped.
Overhyped like how Pirlo was overhyped by fans?he wasnt taking the league by storm by any means... he was a slightly above average MLS player at most. Did he have room for growth sure, but I personally think he was way over hyped.
Overhyped like how Pirlo was overhyped by fans?
he wasnt taking the league by storm by any means... he was a slightly above average MLS player at most. Did he have room for growth sure, but I personally think he was way over hyped.
Jack's whoscored ranking last year puts him in the same company as players like Ola Kamara, Sebastian Blanco, Michael Bradley, and Clint Dempsey, all of who we consider greatly above average players in this league. Difference is, Jack was only 20 compared to them being seasoned vets. Feel this is an awfully revisionist take. Sure, his production the second half of the season dropped. It's hard to keep his first half production consistent for a full season as a 20 year old. His first half production was all-star quality. Would have also loved to have seen what he could have done with a competent rightback like Tinny on his side.
You mentioned overhyped and I was trying to gauge the level of which you were referring. Jack was hardly overhyped, either coming out of HS, college, or in MLS, and as dannd23 mentioned, he has stats to back it up. I used Pirlo as a litmus test/barometer because the Uber hype of him, by fans and not media, was off the charts while he was looking a shell of his former self.not sure what Pirlo has to do with this discussion. But if youd like to talk about pirlo hype im happy to head over to the Pirlo thread.
too bad there's no stats for:
-missed sitters
-unnecessary dribbles to the corner flag when he should have cut in
-bad touches after pirlo passes
-poor first touch on breakaways
-scores 10 goals, misses 300.
-number of times hes shit his pants.
he wasnt taking the league by storm by any means... he was a slightly above average MLS player at most. Did he have room for growth sure, but I personally think he was way over hyped.
The thing with young players is that they have all of that. He also made a lot of bone headed moves and had bits of his game he needed to clean up. I think Kangaroo Jack 's assessment of his ceiling is more or less on point. His floor probably is about "slightly above average".Slightly above average? Are we talking about the same player? When he was playing well in the first half of last season, Jack was a dynamic force in our offense and one of the guys opposing defenses had to key on. He was our second-best offensive player last season, even when taking into effect his second-half struggles.
Totally agree! If Jack was on this year's team, with Tinny behind him and Medina playing Wallace's position (or even if Tajouri is LW), then he'd be so much more dangerous than he was last season. His production drop off the second half of the year was two-fold:I also think there's an eye test. When you saw Jack's technical ability, how he could receive and control a 50 yard pass without breaking his stride, for example, you realized he had a technical ability that was way above MLS level. In our team only Maxi and Villa compare. Everybody else's first touch is poorer than Jack's at 20. It is quite possible he won't ever develop into the full package, with the speed, athleticism, tactical awareness, discipline, tenacity, etc to compete in the EPL or La Liga, but he has the natural talent and the foundation, and 90% of players in MLS don't have either and won't ever.
Erik Palmer Brown is another intra-MLS/CFG example of less than good outcomes so far, but SKC deserves at least as much blame for not playing or selling him beforehand.I think it's widely accepted that Jack has great potential (he was in Man U's academy). What he always needed was minutes in order to develop that potential in game. He did that here, and excelled.
I personally think he (or someone) jumped the gun on this move. No one would have thought he would get a starting spot over Adama Traore. He needed to continue seeing the field. Not saying he necessarily needed to do that here, but he (or someone) should have better considered the odds on him getting minutes.
That being said, how much of a choice did he actually have? That someone mentioned above is probably CFG. I feel like the move was somewhat forced when his performances started generating a lot of attention. A handful of clubs were in for him, and it seems like CFG did not want to let go. So they turned clubs down, and eventually felt it necessary to just buy him from NYC.
That's fine, but I think the right move would have been to either loan him back here, or loan him to a club where he was more likely to see game time. There's a strange track record being developed as a result of CFG starting NYCFC, with players like Mix and Jack being held up in the CFG cycle for reasons no one is really sure about. The one thing that I think you can say definitively is that it's not always the player's best interests that are at the forefront.
It all just feels a bit dirty.
oh google has that data don't you worry.Funny, I thank god everyday they don’t keep stats on how many times we shit our pants.
Would CFG move Jack if he didn't want to go in the first place? I thought the reason they sold him now was because the offers were getting serious and most of us speculated that this was something Jack was pushing for. Or at least strongly desired. If he didn't want to move, couldn't him and CFG just said no to the offers, at least for this window?I think it's widely accepted that Jack has great potential (he was in Man U's academy). What he always needed was minutes in order to develop that potential in game. He did that here, and excelled.
I personally think he (or someone) jumped the gun on this move. No one would have thought he would get a starting spot over Adama Traore. He needed to continue seeing the field. Not saying he necessarily needed to do that here, but he (or someone) should have better considered the odds on him getting minutes.
That being said, how much of a choice did he actually have? That someone mentioned above is probably CFG. I feel like the move was somewhat forced when his performances started generating a lot of attention. A handful of clubs were in for him, and it seems like CFG did not want to let go. So they turned clubs down, and eventually felt it necessary to just buy him from NYC.
That's fine, but I think the right move would have been to either loan him back here, or loan him to a club where he was more likely to see game time. There's a strange track record being developed as a result of CFG starting NYCFC, with players like Mix and Jack being held up in the CFG cycle for reasons no one is really sure about. The one thing that I think you can say definitively is that it's not always the player's best interests that are at the forefront.
It all just feels a bit dirty.
Would CFG move Jack if he didn't want to go in the first place? I thought the reason they sold him now was because the offers were getting serious and most of us speculated that this was something Jack was pushing for. Or at least strongly desired. If he didn't want to move, couldn't him and CFG just said no to the offers, at least for this window?
Would CFG move Jack if he didn't want to go in the first place? I thought the reason they sold him now was because the offers were getting serious and most of us speculated that this was something Jack was pushing for. Or at least strongly desired. If he didn't want to move, couldn't him and CFG just said no to the offers, at least for this window?
I think the going home to play in England factor played a bigger part than the realization he wouldn't be getting much playing time. Would hate to see him become an Agudelo type player that has the potential to go abroad but went a year or two too early, and never reached full potential. TBD on Agudelo, he's still only 25. Needs full playing time which is something he hasn't gotten the past 4-5 years.The timing was odd. He wraps a full season with us in early November then moved at the end of January. At best, if he was getting minutes, he’d have just over 3 months of competitive play between November and mid-August.
For someone already getting attention from England’s U21 team with us, it seems much more sensible if he had played himself into form with us so he had steady minutes from March and then moved in July/August.
You know, that's exactly the choice that would have been made if we were a farm team. It's miles better for us to get our new attackers/wide mids integrated early and not in the final few games before the playoffs.it seems much more sensible if he had played himself into form with us so he had steady minutes from March and then moved in July/August.