wolnutz
Registered
It's been good to hear that many fans hear have allegiances to different premier league teams.
I became a Spurs fan a couple of years ago for a variety of reasons, and I think it's very easy to reconcile rooting for a different EPL team while supporting NYCFC.
If this analogy makes sense to you, baseball in America has a system of "minor leagues" (kind of like B-Teams or U-21s) to develop players. However, unlike in Europe, baseball teams put their minor-league affiliates in areas that don't (or can't) support a major league team. Whether that be for financial or population or demographic reasons (franchises in America are strange.)
For example, my family is from the Bronx, New York. My dad was a Yankees fans, and the Yankees played in the Bronx. However, my folks now live in the suburbs, where the Hudson Valley Renegades play. Technically, the Renegades are a more "local" team. They're cheaper tickets, easier to get to, etc. So my folks are fans of the Renegades.
However, the Renegades and their players are not owned and operated by the Yankees, even though they're only an hour away. They're owned by the Tampa Bay Rays from Florida, who are a rival of the Yankees. So the fans of the Renegades and the Rays are not hand-in-hand. I live in Brooklyn now, and I often go to the minor league games for the Brooklyn Cyclones, who are owned by the Mets, who are rivals of the Yankees.
There's no real conflict of interest in these situations, as you root for a team, not their vesting interests. This applies both to teams owning other teams, corporate sponsors, or in my case, rooting for an ice hockey team owned by a complete asshat.
Last edited: