MLS - October 27 - Chicago (Home)

I still think he's on, the defender's foot is keeping him on, unless I forgot that the line starts at the hip/knee/shoulder of the defender? Very close and I don't mind terribly that it's called offside, as it is very close. Wish it would've stood and then have the ref/VAR overturn it, if it is really offside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gotham Gator
I still think he's on, the defender's foot is keeping him on, unless I forgot that the line starts at the hip/knee/shoulder of the defender? Very close and I don't mind terribly that it's called offside, as it is very close. Wish it would've stood and then have the ref/VAR overturn it, if it is really offside.
Farthest forward legal part of the body, so any of those would be eligible it they are the farthest forward.
 
I still think he's on, the defender's foot is keeping him on, unless I forgot that the line starts at the hip/knee/shoulder of the defender? Very close and I don't mind terribly that it's called offside, as it is very close. Wish it would've stood and then have the ref/VAR overturn it, if it is really offside.
This is my take on it as well. The defender's foot is pretty far back. Add to that the camera angle, fand I think he is on, but I don't think that one shot is enough to overturn either way.

I have pinged Offside Modeling on Twitter. Will see if I get a response.