Reading the varied reactions to various kits, I've started to wonder if this distinction is part of the reason for very different reactions to certain jerseys. There are kits, for example, that I think look perfectly fine (or better) on the field. There it's OK (IMO) if they have bold clashing colors and a somewhat busy design. From hundreds of yards away it all blends and those sorts of things can be a positive. But I would not much care to wear them myself, certainly not casually and maybe not even to a game. For me, I want a simpler cleaner designs. But I can still look at a jersey that is a bit much for my personal taste and consider it good as a team design.
So I'm just wondering if others make the same distinction or do you just think about how it looks on the field, whether you would wear it, or some combo of both.
So I'm just wondering if others make the same distinction or do you just think about how it looks on the field, whether you would wear it, or some combo of both.