A joke that cushing didn't rate him.
Not the first guy he's done this to who has gone on to be useful elsewhere in this league
Are we all just forgetting entirely the long amount of time Cushing had the guy up front and he wasted a million chances that looked exactly like the one in this tweet? And we were all calling for him to bench Magno?
I think we were mostly calling for Cushing to stop playing Magno in the middle and for the club to sign a real ST that can provide the movement in the middle Magno needs to thrive on the wing. Finishing issues aside Bakrar replicates the Taty-like movement conditions under which Magno thrives but Cushing barely played together. Are we all also forgetting that prior to Taty leaving Magno was performing well enough that he was being discussed as one of the top up and coming young players in the league and the team ruined it by trying to make him a ST and having no backup plan when it didn't work?
I realize i just quoted 4 consecutive posts but there is a point. It starts with 2 posts blaming Cushing, then one post saying Cushing gave him a chance, ending with a twist that seems to agree with the first 2 but subtly shifts the blame to Lee (or at least both Lee/Cushing).
My contribution:
Bakrar 2023-24: 1945 minutes 6 goals 75 shots 24 on target
Talles 2023-24: 1975 minutes 5 goals 53 Shots 29 On Target
Both very frustrating but in different ways. We started 2023 asking Talles to step up and become the guy while shifting to the middle. It was a reasonable ask and worth trying but Talles did not and maybe could not step up. Forget balls in nets, Talles barely increased his attempts. Taty shot more than 4 times per 90 while at NYCFC. When we asked Talles to fill the void, his shots went from about 2.2 to 2.4. Maybe we learned he needs to play off a striker, or maybe he's more comfortable not being the guy, or both. By the time 70% of 2023 was over and Lee finally delivered a striker Talles had lost Cushing. Now, Cushing should have tried playing him more with Bakrar anyway. But I also get it. When you go 3/4 of the season asking someone to shoot more and he doesn't you get frustrated, and when you get Bakrar who at least takes his chances (but not well, which is his path of frustration) you might think of him as the replacement not the complement.
Lee gave Cushing no options for 3/4 of a season and when options finally arrived maybe Cushing got a little petty, or had developed blinders. I don't know exactly but it starts with deciding to wait a full year to try to replace the club's best scorer.
Lee created the roster conditions that required Cushing to ask 2 big things of Talles at once: (1) change positions and (2) step up and become the guy. And that experiment with its confounding factors failed. Last year Talles rated 39th in MLS in Shots per Game for players with at least 1500 minutes. At his contract price, you need to do better. By the time the roster gave us and Talles the chance to maybe just be the guy but from his preferred position, Cushing was in "Talles out" mode.
As for 2024, the Talles story is black box to me. He got hurt early then did not play when he returned, until gets just a taste before he was loaned out. Might it have been different if he was completely uninjured for the first half of the season? I can't even guess.
I don't think Cushing handled things well. Coaches should rise above their frustrations in situations like this. But Lee set both Cushing and Talles up to fail, and both grabbed that opportunity. Focusing on Cushing while giving a pass to Lee and Talles makes no sense.