okay and im friends with plenty of people in NYC12 as well. My point is simply that the article still used them to further their political agenda to the point where they felt they needed to make a statement.
White Supremacists In Supporter Section
- Thread starter NYCFC_Dan
- Start date
Isn't NYC12 apart of NYCSC? I thought NYCSC absorbed all of the straggler groups for the sake of organizing everything, but kept the individual natures of each group? (I could be 100% wrong here, just how I interpreted it all)
Whatever you want really, but I’d be hard pressed to believe these people actually are political fascists. That just seems incorrect
100% wrong. They’ve been around since the inaugural season. They’re also BBSC Brown bag SC. Our fellow admin that retired from here was in it as well. They were all at our first ever party at Ryan’s Daughter.
They started NYC12 in the second season. Brown bag was a social club of beer afficianatos and NYC12 acted as the in stadium supporter group. It was third rail without the politics as there was a lot of drama in the early years.
Gotcha. Thanks for the clarification. Always thought NYCSC absorbed BrownBag, NYC12 and others.
NYCSC is composed of NYCSC, Templados, Minervas, and Hooligans. I may be missing a few, thats just off the top of my headGotcha. Thanks for the clarification. Always thought NYCSC absorbed BrownBag, NYC12 and others.
NYC12 is in 235, a little sliver of a section but still in the bleachers with the supporters section. They're a good group of people. Not in the area below the bleachers.
I’ll choose to use Nazis then as that most accurately defines their hatred of other groups and their political goals.
Ah okay they may have moved then. I know they used to be just below the bleachers like in the area in the picture.
So did NYC12 just pull a Barbara Streisand here and create a conversation around something when none existed? Did I miss nyc12 being mentioned specifically in the article? Or were they just unhappy that a general photo of the supporters sexrion was used (which I can understand)
the area they are in in the picture where they have their flags waving is 235
Some NYC12 guys have tickets in the front row of 135.
You need to understand the difference between implicit and explicit.
Your Catholic analogy is bad on many levels. The first being your insistence on equating membership in a religious group with more than a billion members to membership in a soccer team supporters group with maybe 100. Different in scope, time invested and importance in people’s lives.
You know those are not the same yet you continue to make that bad faith argument.
If you were a member of a a parish where bad things happened that the leadership knew about and ignored, then yes, if you don’t leave that parish you are implicit condoning that behavior. You should change your neighborhood (the parish) not abandon Catholicism.
Consistently dialing everyone’s statements up to 11 is not a credible way to make an argument. You’re a slippery slope, straw man, false equivalency natural.
i think you fail to realize how big SC is... they are probably the largest active NYCFC supporters group.
Also im once again choosing to ignore the personal insults.
I could be wrong, but I don’t think the article used NYC12 at all to further any agenda or anything.
They didn’t mention them by name, they just used a photo of the supporters section and that photo happened to have a flag with the NYC12 logo in it.
Today’s post count screams stadium announcement.
Agreed. And while they haven't acknowledged this article, they have actually acknowledged this to some degree in the past (also included in the article).
i will say i think these kind of responses are stupid on their end. but i cant say with certainty with their actual stance is based on 3 crying emojis either.
Similar threads
