2019 Roster Discussion

What Position Should NYCFC Target For Its Splash Signing?

  • Striker

    Votes: 52 89.7%
  • Midfielder

    Votes: 3 5.2%
  • Defender

    Votes: 3 5.2%

  • Total voters
    58
https://talksport.com/football/475403/liverpool-transfer-news-daniel-sturridge-mls/

Hope we aren’t one of them, as good as he is, he is always broken

This rumor originally came from The S*n. Don't post that shit here. Quoting sbrylski...
giphy.gif
 
Was it not clear from day one what this club was for? Did anyone actually expect a totally independent operation?
Anyone that went to the very first club event with Ferran and Claudio did, mainly because they told us to.

Of course, we all should have figured it out during Lampardgate, but alas, the vast majority of us fell guilty to forgetting or forgiving or just being lackadaisical about it.
 
CFG can't run this team like FC Dallas and expect it to fulfil their main objectives - that is (1) an audition stage for potential MCFC signings from around the world and (2) A shiny advertisement for the power and influence of that all-important CFG brand. If NYCFC doesn't get hold of good (expensive) players, then they slip out of CFG's control. If NYCFC becomes a toxic afterthought setting records in futility every year in MLS, then that's miserable for The Brand.

Sure, they're only investing for MCFC's sake.....isn't that the whole reason we exist in the first place?
Those are the main objectives for NYCFC, I can accept that. But where do they sit within the global / CFG hierarchy of objectives?

I also think our ability to execute on both of these objectives is capped by the profile of the league. Hence, why I think they are content to let other clubs invest and grow the profile of the league. That doesn't necessarily mean "a toxic afterthought setting records in futility every year in MLS", but achieving these objectives doesn't necessarily require "blazing a trail of glory setting records in spending and success every year in MLS" either. Or even being anything other than an "early adopter" (rather than an "innovator").

Is that the end of the world? No, but in general we tend to view the world through false or exaggerated dichotomies. And we tend to view the way others view the world through even more exaggerated dichotomies. Hence a fan base at war with itself right now.

Of course this is 95% speculation, because to be honest, the lack of transparency or clear, earnest, 2-way communication between the club / CFG and the fans leaves a massive vacuum for us all to fill based on our personal inclinations.
 
I read that the other day. One thing I would like to see delved more into there is whether there is a statistical difference in injuries for those players that normally play on grass, and then play on turf.

I could potentially see that being a concern. Their analysis is really good to demonstrate that injuries as a whole don't really vary from turf vs grass. But I could see it being possible that a guy who has played on grass his whole life being more susceptible to injuries on turf. That article doesn't parse that out.

I imagine there would be a difference in how turf affects a 24 year old American who has played on turf a ton his whole life, vs a European veteran.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
I read that the other day. One thing I would like to see delved more into there is whether there is a statistical difference in injuries for those players that normally play on grass, and then play on turf.

I could potentially see that being a concern. Their analysis is really good to demonstrate that injuries as a whole don't really vary from turf vs grass. But I could see it being possible that a guy who has played on grass his whole life being more susceptible to injuries on turf. That article doesn't parse that out.

I imagine there would be a difference in how turf affects a 24 year old American who has played on turf a ton his whole life, vs a European veteran.
Haha, I was thinking the same thing about transitional case.

I was also thinking about segmenting for age.

And time of day.

Basically, as the recent beneficiary of (turf-related) knee surgery, I am super curious why the data doesn't seem to agree with almost everybody I've ever played soccer with, and a good number of the referees :) And my knee.
 
Basically, as the recent beneficiary of (turf-related) knee surgery, I am super curious why the data doesn't seem to agree with almost everybody I've ever played soccer with, and a good number of the referees :) And my knee.
Theory:

When people injure themselves on turf, they say, "Damn that turf!!"
When people injure themselves on grass, they say, "Damn!"
 

So we drafted a goalie because the scout is friends with his college coach. If this kid doesn’t see the field chalk it up under the NYCFC Fails Yet Again column.

true, but i mean was the same done for lewis? for caldwell? shelton? harrison was kinda sorta in radar anyway. all it tells me is that no one in coaching staff scouts college kids.
 
Sturridge I'd LOVE. He's a player, consistent and always entertaining. Caveat is when he isn't hurt. He's like Griffey :(

Sturridge is likely to get a lengthy ban for his insider betting. Not sure if any ban will be international but I suspect it will be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
Dyer gets acres of space in The Athletic for an exclusive interview with Reyna on roster strategy and manages to tell us exactly nothing that we didn't already know.

Blame Dyer or Reyna for the absence of new info?
Also, in this article Reyna does seem more slanted away from the big name signing than we have seen in other interviews. It's a matter of emphasis rather than a specific fact, but that was my take-away. Of course, even there, it's hard to tell if that's how Dyer wrote it or was Reyna actually tilted in that direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoupInNYC