I'm not sure I'm following what you're getting at here.Didn’t Montreal win the tournament that most mattered for Canada? Or put differently, didn’t Toronto come up short when the only method of advancement was on the line?
I'm not sure I'm following what you're getting at here.Didn’t Montreal win the tournament that most mattered for Canada? Or put differently, didn’t Toronto come up short when the only method of advancement was on the line?
Toronto FC adamant they deserve CCL spot if they win MLS Cup | MLSSoccer.com
Toronto: If we win, we should get CCL spotwww.mlssoccer.com
You couldn’t beat Montreal to win the Canadian Championship. Go home and cry in your beer.
Toronto FC adamant they deserve CCL spot if they win MLS Cup | MLSSoccer.com
Toronto: If we win, we should get CCL spotwww.mlssoccer.com
You couldn’t beat Montreal to win the Canadian Championship. Go home and cry in your beer.
don't know why this is even being discussed. canadian championship is probably the easiest way to get into CCL and they couldn't do it. so now they "deserve" to get into MLS cup? no. you don't. gtfo. even more reason to want seattle to crush them.
Toronto FC adamant they deserve CCL spot if they win MLS Cup | MLSSoccer.com
Toronto: If we win, we should get CCL spotwww.mlssoccer.com
You couldn’t beat Montreal to win the Canadian Championship. Go home and cry in your beer.
Uh, no. All three Canadian teams should be thankful they’re allowed to partake in MLS. There is now a Canadian League that they’re more suited for but for obvious financial reasons they stayed rather than switching. There’s zero reason why they should be granted a US Federation slot to the CCL.While I understand you guys's points, you also have to understand their point which is that unlike MLS teams which have three ways into it (open cup, mls cup, mls), they only have one. Even if they have a bad day at the office in the canadian championship, they should be allowed in through means that show they're good over the course of a season. ( listen, we lost to Orlando in the open cup. Imagine if that was our only way into the CCL? You'd be pissed too.) I personally do think that they should be allowed to take a spot from the american side if they deserve so through MLS play. (i.e. 1.5 CAN and 3.5 US, where the .5's are either a canadian or american team).
Well then they should give up their Canadian status just be considered American clubs like who Swansea and Cardiff are considered English clubs in Wales.While I understand you guys's points, you also have to understand their point which is that unlike MLS teams which have three ways into it (open cup, mls cup, mls), they only have one. Even if they have a bad day at the office in the canadian championship, they should be allowed in through means that show they're good over the course of a season. ( listen, we lost to Orlando in the open cup. Imagine if that was our only way into the CCL? You'd be pissed too.) I personally do think that they should be allowed to take a spot from the american side if they deserve so through MLS play. (i.e. 1.5 CAN and 3.5 US, where the .5's are either a canadian or american team).
Well then they should give up their Canadian status just be considered American clubs like who Swansea and Cardiff are considered English clubs in Wales.
Uh, no. All three Canadian teams should be thankful they’re allowed to partake in MLS. There is now a Canadian League that they’re more suited for but for obvious financial reasons they stayed rather than switching. There’s zero reason why they should be granted a US Federation slot to the CCL.
I agree, but at what point do we consider that Canada has 10 first division teams? I don’t really have an opinion, but the CPL is designated first division officially, no?Canada has 3 first division teams and gets 1 CCL spot. That's not a bad ratio.
I agree, but at what point do we consider that Canada has 10 first division teams? I don’t really have an opinion, but the CPL is designated first division officially, no?
Maybe when there is more than a de minimis chance that one of the other 7 can win the Cup. I mean, they can give whatever designation they want, but the MLS teams are more than head-and-shoulders above the rest on whatever metric you want to cite (fans, player salaries, investment, etc.).I agree, but at what point do we consider that Canada has 10 first division teams? I don’t really have an opinion, but the CPL is designated first division officially, no?
Wouldn't reversing it make sense? MLS Cup Winner or CPL Winner, and then send the cup winner to CONCACAF League?Reminder that the CPL winner gets a bid to the CONCACAF League. Canada has two routes to the Champions League Final, not one. Therefore, the Canadian Soccer Association cannot hide behind the challenge of providing a path to CPL teams and MLS teams. I am sympathetic, but ultimately this is on the CSA, not MLS or the USSF. They can revise to the following:
Champions League - MLS Cup Winner (if applicable), else the Canadian Championship Winner
CONCACAF League - CPL Winner
This is the simplest solution for the foreseeable future. Win your league's biggest trophy, you're in. If a non-Canadian team wins one of the leagues (MLS), then backfill the spot with the Canadian Championship winner.
Wouldn't reversing it make sense? MLS Cup Winner or CPL Winner, and then send the cup winner to CONCACAF League?
Nono. I mean, the Canadian Championship (which is a lesser tournament, since it's like 3 games...) would go to CONCACAF League, and the CPL winner (or MLS cup winner, if canadian) would qualify directly...You'd have a lot of years where the CPL Champ goes directly to the Champions League while the MLS team qualifies for the CONCACAF League then. I think that would be backwards as a practical matter.
Nono. I mean, the Canadian Championship (which is a lesser tournament, since it's like 3 games...) would go to CONCACAF League, and the CPL winner (or MLS cup winner, if canadian) would qualify directly...