I don't think this really contradicts
Keith Putnam's point. CFG wants a common playing style. They say it, and I believe they believe it, and I even believe they are trying in good faith to implement it. And I don't think Keith disagreed with that either. But in practice, as Keith noted, it only exists in a broad, vague sense and it's not working. I made the same point a couple of times in the last several weeks and I think it holds. If CFG had successfully implemented a common style, we would not have this utter fiasco of a coaching transition between 2 coaches playing the same system. But it's apparent that Patrick and Dome are not really playing the same system. Dome doesn't even pretend he's playing the same system. He has articulated differences on more than one occasion. And though he might have considered those differences as tweaks, in practice it completely upended the team. It's been part of the discussion here today: PV played one-touch passing. Dome has the team playing more slowly and deliberate. Which one is the system? Based on the Guardian article -- which I have read before, -- and CFG's press talk and all their hype generally, it seems to me that the one-touch passing that PV used is more like Pep-ball than Dome. Which I can't for the life of me make sense of because DOme is Pep's top guy. But since when is Pep about slowing down so the other team can crowd the ball handler, make him pass backwards, and by the time you finally get near the box there are at least 7 defenders planted there?
Red Bulls play a common style across their teams. They replaced Marsch with someone in-house. He made changes, but retained the core elements, and if anything that damn team is even better.
CFG plays a common style across their teams. They replaced Vieira with someone in-house. He made changes, and retained the core elements, and the team went to fucking hell.
CFG might be trying to play a unified system but isn't doing it right.