Didn’t see it mentioned about option to buy at the end of the loan, but if MLS is still MLS’ing that would be a stipulation in the agreement.
Didn’t see it mentioned about option to buy at the end of the loan, but if MLS is still MLS’ing that would be a stipulation in the agreement.
Didn’t see it mentioned about option to buy at the end of the loan, but if MLS is still MLS’ing that would be a stipulation in the agreement.
Got it! Thanks.Not necessarily true. Two pages back.
http://nycfcforums.com/index.php?threads/keaton-parks-to-nycfc-confirmed.6825/page-2#post-269288
??Got it! Thanks.
If they didn’t include it, wonder if it’s due to his transfer cost (not that it’s high) that they wouldn’t want to fork over? Or if Benfica simply said no deal, it’s one year or nothing, and the loan is to just get him playing time as opposed to an audition?
I'm considering whether to refine it to Club opaCity.New York's hottest club is ...
Now that this is official, I feel compelled to point out that he goes by Keaton.
If we make him change, I’ll be disgusted and unsurprised. As supporters, I feel like we’re duty bound to make sure others/journos don’t call him Parks.
I mean, I’ve never seen him make a big deal out of it, but if it’s what you put on your shirt, I assume it’s your preference.I have an irrational dislike for people who insist on stuff like this (him, not you). We all have 2 names. People gonna use them. Deal with it.
At the same time I think it's rude not to comply with such requests.
Keaton, huh?
Just because somebody annoys me is no reason to be rude.for your personal cognitive dissonance, I got nothing.
And if that's all it is, I don't even have an irrational dislike. Mix put Mix on his shirt. And sometimes people called him Diskerud.I mean, I’ve never seen him make a big deal out of it, but if it’s what you put on your shirt, I assume it’s your preference.
I just like when American players have the balls to not be cookie cutter.
Was that rude? I didn’t mean it to be rude. More just an acknowledgement of my personal limitations.Just because somebody annoys me is no reason to be rude.
You completely misunderstood. I was explaining that I see no dissonance in being courteous even when I'm annoyed when people are overly particular about their names.Was that rude? I didn’t mean it to be rude. More just an acknowledgement of my personal limitations.
Did I? Or did you fail to properly express your intended meaning?You completely misunderstood. I was explaining that I see no dissonance in being courteous even when I'm annoyed when people are overly particular about their names.
Oh, you wanna get meta?Did I? Or did you fail to properly express your intended meaning?
(I’m sure I just didn’t read carefully, but couldn’t resist a little needle.)
My brain has a hypnokit design permanently imprinted now. Thanks. Jerk.Oh, you wanna get meta?
Well, just because I might have communicated poorly does not mean you failed to understand my intended meaning.
Boom.
I think it was stated earlier here that Benfica do not want to sell him at all and are just looking for playing time. I read that their current roster makeup just isn’t good for him at the moment, but they love him there, so do not want to sell.Got it! Thanks.
If they didn’t include it, wonder if it’s due to his transfer cost (not that it’s high) that they wouldn’t want to fork over? Or if Benfica simply said no deal, it’s one year or nothing, and the loan is to just get him playing time as opposed to an audition?