Mostly cause San Fran's money is supporting the Sac Rep FC bid and Oakland is broke.Why isn't San Fran or Oakland being considered?
Considering their massive population, I don't see why not. If you were to overlay California over the northeast, you could probably squeeze about six teams within the same footprint. It's kind of unfair for supporter's of an expansion club in this region to question California.
Can't say I'm particularly surprised its hardly a city that fits Garber's family entertainment (vomit) philosophies. Would have been a hell of a lot more interesting than other locations especially had it lived up to Vegas expectations for craziness. Seriously a club based in Vegas should strive to be as controversial as possible its the perfect place for that kind of edgier marketing. Feel its a wasted opportunity by MLS to finally establish a major sporting organization in Sin City. Between LV and the other boring candidates I wouldn't have had any hesitation.
There is a reason why Leagues have been hesitant to give a franchise to Vegas, and that's because it's still an open question to whether it can actually support a franchise versus one off sporting events. As for a team being as controversial possible have you been paying attention to how leagues are run these days? They want as little controversy as possible, the family friendly philosophy has descended on most sports leagues these days.
Exactly that's why I said "not particularly surprised" that Garber (if cancer couldn't dampen his apparent joy at being a corporate puppet nothing will) and the other suits have turned Vegas down. If Vegas couldn't be Vegas the other weaknesses in location become more relevant. I'm not the only one to see an alternative market to families (primarily young males) which is the short sighted, same old approach by MLS. I don't watch the "other football" but XFL had the concept and failed more due to quality of gameplay than anything else. MLS of course is still behind other leagues in that respect but improved gameplay and "edgier marketing" could be exactly what it needs.
Was there a group in either SF or Oakland that put in a bid for an MLS franchise?Why isn't San Fran or Oakland being considered?
no but the San Francisco 49ers are investors in Sacramento Republic SC.Was there a group in either SF or Oakland that put in a bid for an MLS franchise?
Can't say I'm particularly surprised its hardly a city that fits Garber's family entertainment (vomit) philosophies. Would have been a hell of a lot more interesting than other locations especially had it lived up to Vegas expectations for craziness. Seriously a club based in Vegas should strive to be as controversial as possible its the perfect place for that kind of edgier marketing. Feel its a wasted opportunity by MLS to finally establish a major sporting organisation in Sin City. Between LV and the other boring candidates I wouldn't have had any hesitation.
Can't say I'm particularly surprised its hardly a city that fits Garber's family entertainment (vomit) philosophies. Would have been a hell of a lot more interesting than other locations especially had it lived up to Vegas expectations for craziness. Seriously a club based in Vegas should strive to be as controversial as possible its the perfect place for that kind of edgier marketing. Feel its a wasted opportunity by MLS to finally establish a major sporting organisation in Sin City. Between LV and the other boring candidates I wouldn't have had any hesitation.
http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nfl/...ast-tracking-st-louis-rams-backed-nfl-stadium
It sounds like Los Angeles (or at least the area) is making a major push to snatch up the Rams.
If the Rams do move, that leaves St. Louis with only a MLB and NHL team. 21st TV market. Might be smart of MLS to start really pushing for investors there, although the Cardinals would make for stiff competition during the MLS season.
I think its the city and state (StL MO) that are pushing for the stadium. Maybe they will build the stadium regardless if the Rams stay or go and hope that if the Rams leave they could entice the Chargers or Raiders to relocate.The group trying to get MLS to go to St.Louis is part of the group try to be the Ram there. If they leave (and I think they are) so goes the group trying to fund the stadium there
Thing is the city and state aren't going to pass anything that need tax money. That is part of the reason the Rams want out. So STL isn't getting a new NFL team Unless it's 100% tax payer money which isn't happen.I think its the city and state (StL MO) that are pushing for the stadium. Maybe they will build the stadium regardless if the Rams stay or go and hope that if the Rams leave they could entice the Chargers or Raiders to relocate.
The current plan on the table for the StL NFL stadium calls for tons of public money and have publicly asked MLS to get involved.Thing is the city and state aren't going to pass anything that need tax money. That is part of the reason the Rams want out. So STL isn't getting a new NFL team Unless it's 100% tax payer money which isn't happen.
It was an Off hand comment, so not really anything STL isn't really in playThe current plan on the table for the StL NFL stadium calls for tons of public money and have publicly asked MLS to get involved.
BTW What does this have to do with MLS in Vegas?