I hear you. But watch the replay. It was a clear deflection. You even see the keeper start one move and then buckle in that way where they know the trajectory changed.
I'm not taking anything away from Cufre. Some shots take lucky deflections but they are still more likely to go when pinged at high velocity and on frame. That's what he did and the slight deflection helped. I just don't take that as clinical. For me there are five categories of shot:
1. Lucky - helpful deflection, could argue that some long range shots are hope and prayer lucky
2. Unlucky - woodwork, a rotten bounce
3. Poor - unforced errors, weak shots right at the keeper, off frame
4. Good - but not good enough, a decent shot but not enough to get past the keeper or other blockers
5. Clinical - no deflection, no keeper error, buried in a corner or 5 hole
Cufre's shot was a 1. I'd argue Magno had a 3 and 3 4s last night. Unfortunately his 4 was his last and worst shot of the night. So he suffers from our recency and confirmation biases. Cufre's goal was his last and best shot of the night giving him the benefit of our recency and confirmation biases. In fact, I'd be willing to wager at least a little that you forgot his "hey Alfredo, I bet I can take wild speculative useless shots from further away from goal than you can" 50 yard pointlessness in the 35th minute. To be clear, I don't begrudge him that shot. I'm high on Cufre. I'm just saying that I'm not sure I put him or any of his shots in the clinical bucket. (I'd have to go back to his previous goal to comment there. Memory alone tells me it was a pretty clear and clinical finish.)