Ashley Cole and Lampard were both offered contracts.
The only source for that came from Mou and I remember when he was quoted it was clear to me he offered them deals that were sub par, if any were offered at all.
Personally, I don't believe Mou at all. This is what he said.
"
But while fellow Blues veteran John Terry put pen to paper on a new one-year deal, it appears both Lampard and Cole took the decision to move to pastures new, with Mourinho admitting they could have extended their stays in west London.
‘They were [offered new deals],’ the Chelsea boss revealed.
‘We were in this process until the end, but you arrive into a moment [where you ask] what’s the best for the team? What’s the best for the other players? What’s the best for them?"
http://metro.co.uk/2014/08/02/chels...ered-new-deals-reveals-jose-mourinho-4819210/
As opposed to Frank saying the following one month later :
‘I would have obviously stayed if Chelsea had offered me another year. There was no reason for me to leave,’ he told the Sun.
‘Yes, I wanted to play a bit more regularly but I’m not stupid.
‘If Chelsea had given me a new contract it would have been mad not to take it at the time.
‘I had a chat with Jose Mourinho and both he and the club were always great with me. The decision was made – and I don’t know who made it.
‘I also felt like I didn’t want to be a player who faded away – with that being the last memory people had of me.
‘So maybe it was the right time. Maybe it was right that the club took it out of my hands.’ "
http://metro.co.uk/2014/09/05/frank...yer-if-club-had-offered-new-contract-4857769/
Just a matter of who you believe. I think Mou has more to lose with the fans than Frank does, so he made up a lie about a contract extension.