Already gotcha covered:An underwater stadium sounds cool, though.
http://nycfcforums.com/index.php?th...ract-being-terminated.4354/page-2#post-133576
Already gotcha covered:An underwater stadium sounds cool, though.
They could schedule an Etihad Airways flyover before every game.
While I like the idea I'm not sure it makes sense. I mean, I've enjoyed the planes overhead for decades at Mets games so surely we can handle it. Wouldn't mind a roof for those early March games of course although that adds to the cost. And while EWR isn't all that far from RBA it's not anywhere near as close as LGA is. Shea was practically built at the end of the main runway, after all.
And I'd actually propose building the stadium *above* ground, mostly to increase parking capacity but also to avert rising sea levels.
Airplane noise is not a big deal during Mets games or the Open. Don't really think it'll be a big issue.
Would be interesting if the training grounds would be at Willets also. Wonder if they would consider moving the soon to be opened facility in the future? Aren't the building facilities modular?
Well, a "while" could mean until 2022-23, whenever the stadium would open.No. Plan is to keep First Team Training in Rockland for a while.
Question would be, where is the Academy going?
Aren't they planning that, with also extending the air train to the area?
https://ny.curbed.com/2017/11/17/16668718/laguardia-airport-airtrain-funding-cuomo-port-authority
View attachment 8193
View attachment 8194 View attachment 8195
The short version is this-I will never understand why they don't just extend the existing JFK AirTrain north along the Van Wyck and Grand Central. The two airports would be linked together.
Only domestic flights leave LaGuardia right? In reality an Etihad plane leaving LaGuardia is really unlikely.
There’s is a 1500 nautical mile “perimeter rule” that restricts LGA flights to that distance, except on Saturdays and flights to Denver that were grandfathered in. Among the longer flights are Houston and Dallas, not exactly “regional”.Regional flights. Also has Canadian flights.
Is that 1500 rule because it limits the size of the plane thus having less mass to slow down/stop on their short runways?There’s is a 1500 nautical mile “perimeter rule” that restricts LGA flights to that distance, except on Saturdays and flights to Denver that were grandfathered in. Among the longer flights are Houston and Dallas, not exactly “regional”.
The Canadian flights (Toronto, Montreal and Ottawa) are able to operate because of preclearance facilities at those airports.
Nope. It was enacted when JFK opened to force airlines and travelers to go there instead of LGA.Is that 1500 rule because it limits the size of the plane thus having less mass to slow down/stop on their short runways?