Stadium Discussion

What Will Be The Name Of The New Home?

  • Etihad Stadium

    Votes: 4 17.4%
  • Etihad Park

    Votes: 11 47.8%
  • Etihad Field

    Votes: 7 30.4%
  • Etihad Arena

    Votes: 1 4.3%
  • Etihad Bowl

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    23
While I like the idea I'm not sure it makes sense. I mean, I've enjoyed the planes overhead for decades at Mets games so surely we can handle it. Wouldn't mind a roof for those early March games of course although that adds to the cost. And while EWR isn't all that far from RBA it's not anywhere near as close as LGA is. Shea was practically built at the end of the main runway, after all.

And I'd actually propose building the stadium *above* ground, mostly to increase parking capacity but also to avert rising sea levels.

The roof is about the noise and the weather. Roof keeps the noise in and adds to the experience. It also keeps the good and bad elements out weatherwise. A pitch below ground, similar to what you see at Camden Yards in Baltimore, only adds to the amplification of sounds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taurus and Seth
Airplane noise is not a big deal during Mets games or the Open. Don't really think it'll be a big issue.

It's already loud enough at Ashe with the roof. But before the roof some players would try to serve as a plane flew overhead to get an advantage.
 
Would be interesting if the training grounds would be at Willets also. Wonder if they would consider moving the soon to be opened facility in the future? Aren't the building facilities modular?

No. Plan is to keep First Team Training in Rockland for a while.

Question would be, where is the Academy going?
 
  • Like
Reactions: COLINMOUTH
If I remember correctly from one of the NYCFC House Chalk Talks the Academy Director said, ideally, that the academy would be located in Queens somewhere since it's central to where most of the academy players come from.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert and adam
https://ny.curbed.com/platform/amp/...&utm_source=twitter&__twitter_impression=true

"...the de Blasio administration is prioritizing the construction of affordable housing before anything else."

Hopefully this is just one writer's opinion because if we have to wait for housing to be built before a stadium is constructed, we're going to be waiting until 2022 before a shovel goes in the ground.

-----------------------------------------

News piece on NY1:

http://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs...-drops-shopping-mall--adds-affordable-housing
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert
I will never understand why they don't just extend the existing JFK AirTrain north along the Van Wyck and Grand Central. The two airports would be linked together.
The short version is this-
1. A Port Authority ridership study revealed there is not enough traffic to justify connecting the airtrains (we’re all free to disagree with this data, but that’s what’s they said.)
2. AirTrain is funded primarily by Passenger Facility Charges- part of the taxes you pay each time you book a flight. These fees are meant to benefit only the airport they came from. If fees from JFK or LGA are used to benefit passengers at the other airport, it gets messy.

Re: airport noise, the runway configurations depend on wind conditions, with JFK pretty much calling the shots and everyone else around them adapting to make it work. One of the departure procedures at LGA is actually called the “Tennis 6” and involves a sharp turn after takeoff to try and avoid overflying Flushing Meadows Park.
 
Regional flights. Also has Canadian flights.
There’s is a 1500 nautical mile “perimeter rule” that restricts LGA flights to that distance, except on Saturdays and flights to Denver that were grandfathered in. Among the longer flights are Houston and Dallas, not exactly “regional”.
The Canadian flights (Toronto, Montreal and Ottawa) are able to operate because of preclearance facilities at those airports.
 
There’s is a 1500 nautical mile “perimeter rule” that restricts LGA flights to that distance, except on Saturdays and flights to Denver that were grandfathered in. Among the longer flights are Houston and Dallas, not exactly “regional”.
The Canadian flights (Toronto, Montreal and Ottawa) are able to operate because of preclearance facilities at those airports.
Is that 1500 rule because it limits the size of the plane thus having less mass to slow down/stop on their short runways?
 
Melinda Katz State of the Borough speech is up if you guys want to listen.

Section where she talks about a stadium is here:
 
  • Like
Reactions: adam