Stadium Discussion
- Thread starter Gene
- Start date
It’s impossible to get out of the echo chamber. Fox News. Twitter. MSNBC.
All an echo chamber focusing on the same people and same
Topics.
It’s work. Too easy to tune out other opinions, too hard to find rational debate.
ETA: yeah, I know that’s not an accident. Everyone has an agenda. Pretty much none of them are what’s best for you and me. Or you and your other friend or mine. Or your folks or mine. Or your kids or mine. Etc...
ETA 2: this is supposed to be good
Leadership? She practically always comes off as a left-wing Trump. It’s embarrasing that these people get elected. That isn’t smart or cute or even creative.
Last edited:
Edit. I have fixed the link. Sorry about.
https://sbisoccer.com/2019/04/as-st...-de-grandpre-defends-rbnys-attendance-numbers
This is an interesting article about what is going on with RBA. thanks to Dave Martinez for posting. It will be interesting to see if the all the new stadiums will have flexible capacity system.
https://sbisoccer.com/2019/04/as-st...-de-grandpre-defends-rbnys-attendance-numbers
This is an interesting article about what is going on with RBA. thanks to Dave Martinez for posting. It will be interesting to see if the all the new stadiums will have flexible capacity system.
Last edited:
Probably people here I’m friends with who will be upset over my views on this. To that I would say, “see?”
Sit down and talk issues with people who don’t choose the same brand pair of shoes as you. You’re likely to see they walk many of the same roads. Something else just feels a little more comfortable. It doesn’t make you mortal enemies.
That pretty much sums up why I despise hostility driven politics. No one takes the time to engage anyone beyond their “base”. It’s nauseating and very much lowest common denominator politicization of social problem solving.
To give you an Alexander Donald Cortrump: I literally can’t even.
Sit down and talk issues with people who don’t choose the same brand pair of shoes as you. You’re likely to see they walk many of the same roads. Something else just feels a little more comfortable. It doesn’t make you mortal enemies.
That pretty much sums up why I despise hostility driven politics. No one takes the time to engage anyone beyond their “base”. It’s nauseating and very much lowest common denominator politicization of social problem solving.
To give you an Alexander Donald Cortrump: I literally can’t even.
Link is dead.
Also the first environmentalist president. Go Nixon!
Wait. Shit. Does this all mean that in a few years we'll look back and say Trump minus the corruption was actually a really great president?
Ask Puerto Rico.
Sorry Midas. To me, this is bullshit. If you think they are all the same or all morons or all running on hostility you aren't paying attention or you are being intentionally obtuse. This is the kind of moral equivalency that is just as toxic as the hostility.
There are great candidates out there, at the local, state and national level. And even in races where there aren't great candidates, there are still better and worse options.
I guess what I'm saying is - to you and everyone else - get off your ass and vote.
Better or worse or more aligned with your favored special interest groups?
Not everyone believes in special interest groups. Just like in National Treasure 2, there are some Nick Gates true beliebers out there
Nixon was very right wing on international policy and a fervent anti-communist.
On domestic policy he was -- well let's say at least shaded to the left to a significant degree on some but not all issues, putting into place: The Clean Air Act, affirmative action, an expansion of social security benefits, the original version of the AMT, OSHA, plus he imposed wage and price controls over the entire US economy via executive order. You can make a list of conservative things he did too, even outside of international policy. He was a straddler. But to point to any individual left-ish domestic policy and expect surprise that Nixon supported it only works if one's audience is ignorant.
Only Nixon could go to China makes sense. Even Nixon supported UBI, not so much.
Pretty much every president has been reviled as a dangerous extremist by his enemies while in office, then granted strange new respect when the next president from that party gains the office (or even the next candidate), and used as a cudgel to bash the current dangerously extreme occupant.
Last edited:
Feel weird talking politics in here... But this thread always go to different subjects... Its our frustration with no real stadium news.
Im just going to put my 2 cents here... We should move elections to weekend (sunday) or make it a national holiday like other countries... So we have more turnout. I think i read election day in the US was chosen during a time when most folks lived or were farmers.
We should be able to vote online with an 800 number like American Idol. That would require some type of verification which could help stop all the voter fraud.
Totally debatable except for the all of those public records showing the billions they spend influencing politics. Must have been the repetillan secret masons illuminati overlord having us huff chem trails.
Last edited:
