Araos has discredited this on Twitter. Deal off. Stadium gone.
I believe that she is just tweeting a follow-up update from the poster I republished earlier in the week from the FB Supporters Page. I won’t give his name as that’s technically a private page, and in any event, I don’t know him personally so I can’t add any flavor as to credibility, etc.
This seems more an “I don’t know anything and it’s not public” than a “this deal died.”Araos has discredited this on Twitter. Deal off. Stadium gone.
I'll fly in from wherever the hell I've retired to.
Unsure as in you have reason to doubt, or just lack info to have a meaningful opinion?Good call because he actually asked for his name not to be included in her twitter post.
Also unsure as to his credibility
“ORANGEBURG, New York -- New York City FC president Jon Patricof says that a tract of land at Harlem River Yards is not an area of focus for a proposed stadium site.”I am curious about the GAL site, all I had heard to this point was movement on the Harlem Yards site. Are we sure that is dead in the water?
No reason to doubt but no reason to trust either. I've seen him posting on the page here and there but i dont know him personally or who/what his sources are. Basically the latter of your 2 choices.Unsure as in you have reason to doubt, or just lack info to have a meaningful opinion?
I was wondering about that earlier last week. Some “announcement” (if we call the rumors that) mentioned within a mile south ofYankees stadium. GAL is a quarter mile at best. Harlem Yards is slightly more than a mile - seems like a real possibility as whomever said such was possibly/probably using a typical-world rounding down as the exact distance didn’t matter to their content delivery.I am curious about the GAL site, all I had heard to this point was movement on the Harlem Yards site. Are we sure that is dead in the water?
edit: Thanks sundance, guess it might be, although plans do change sometimes
Yes, but "just" doesn't quite cover it.Can someone smarter than me enumerate the engineering challenges of the proposed site?
Is it just the street and the train station?
Would be very NYC to build up when you can't build out thoYes, but "just" doesn't quite cover it.
The train station has four tracks at ground level and two platforms. Not sure those can be lowered to be underground though as we're right on the water and not sure where the water table is. Not to mention future flooding concerns. There's also quite a number of highway ramps on multiple levels as well. Essentially the stadium might need to be on a platform that's six stories up in the air if the ramps can't be moved. In addition, it's not a large site either. An Avaya-sized stadium would fill the site, and a Red Bull Arena-sized one would overrun it, and that's only the stadium; no plazas, no parking, no room anywhere outside the building.
So sure, it's possible to shoehorn a stadium into the space, but there are challenges.
I always just assumed if we were at this location that the Cromwell Ave. ramp would be taken out, the train would be diverted a bit.
I thought the parking garage is in play, which opens up a good amount of space.It's doable to remove/move the Deegan entrance ramp. It is a non-starter to encroach even a teeny bit into Heritage Park.
The state just spent about 2.5 years from 2016-18 (and unknown $$) rebuilding the Cromwell Avenue ramp. It would not be the first time work was done only to be almost immediately demolished, but I don't think you can just assume that ramp away either. It also provides the only access connecting the SB Deegan to Bronx streets between Fordham Road and 135th Street that does not require that cars make left turns on or off the Macombs Dam Bridge at an already overloaded intersection.