If you look at the timeline for NYCFC wanting St. John's for CCL to getting rejected St. John, you would be foolish to discount that as a factor for why they decided to released this info at this exact time.Does anybody believe the club is not engaged in a PR push? I don't and that's not what I wrote. The accusation at issue is that the article is essentially fake and designed to cloud our minds so we forget about playing at RBA. That's what I reject.
Of course this article is part of a PR push to help create goodwill both among fans and the local community. And that's a good thing.
What is the strategic benefit of releasing news of a non-binding agreement at this exact time except to be a distractor or misdirection for probably the worst optic news in club history?