Can’t pretend to analyze this hire other than he’s been on the precipice of this opportunity for a while it seems.Moving Quick!
Tommy Scoops says we have our new sporting director. Fascinating that we've gone for someone from the USL.
I watched a couple Sacramento Republic matches this year. I like the way they played. The USL can be something of a free-for-all, but they were well organized and really solid defensively (always big in my book).I vaguely remember there being a quote at some point about Lee being one of the only people in CFG who understood the MLS cap and salary rules, and Lee talking about how much work it was to learn it all. Getting an American, with MLS ties and familiarity with the concept of cap rules and roster restrictions, is huge.
Imagine having owners promising the biggest and the best instead of the next Jovan, Mounsef, Agu or Julian?
Yes. Resources and ambition. We have the first part.Am
Ambition wins championships.
Back in March I pointed out that every one of Fernandez's 5 goals at NYCFC came in transition and never against a settled defense. He scored 2 more times after that post.
Cincinnati 5/4/25 '9 against a settled defense from straight in front of goal
Columbus 9/17/25 90+4 on another fast break.
Out of 7 goals in 2.5 years he managed one goal against a settled defense.
But here's something sadder than a forward who can almost never score against a settled defense. That would be a forward who needs unsettled defenses even to manage a shot on goal, and then shoots directly at the keeper every time, and almost always with no juice:
2025 Augustin Ojeda.
Charlotte 7/12/25 '38
The Charlotte keeper comes off his line after a bad turnover. Ojeda fields a rebound of a twisting Martinez shot that was stopped by a defender. As the keeper scrambled back, Ojeda sent a weak slow shot 2 feet off ground directly to where the keeper was running as if he purposefully led him with a forward pass. This was just a terrible effort.
Columbus 9/17/25 '86
Fast break right side received great ball marked by one defender, running straight at goal. Weak shot skipping the turf directly to the keeper.
RB 9/27/25 '74
Fast break right side received great ball, running straight at goal. Weak shot right at keeper on a somewhat tough angle.
Philadelphia 10/4/25 '69
Transition, pass from Maxi. Ojeda receives the ball about 30 yards out. He moves forward and has 3 NYCFC players in the box against an unsettled defense. His decision was to shoot from 25 yards. He slipped as he did and sent a weak dribbler directly to to the keeper.
Philadelphia 11/4/25 '38
His best shot of season. Fast break, carries the ball in. Squared up just off center. This was his best hard shot on goal but again went directly to the keeper chest high for a very easy save.
Miami 11/29/25 '48
Turnover, defense scrambling. Maxi makes a poor decision and sends a weak pass that Ojeda corrals before in turn taking a very weak shot deflected onto goal right at the keeper. This was less his fault than any of the others, but it's not like he did better when he had things perfectly teed up.
All year, including the playoffs, Ojeda managed just six shots on goal.
He generated zero shots that were on target but not straight to the keeper.
He never went upper 90.
He never hit either low corner.
He never went far post or near.
Not once.
All keepers had to do was properly position for the best angle and Ojeda conveniently sent the ball exactly there, every time, or he missed the goal entirely.
All year.
I had already figured this out a couple of months ago back when we had that big Ojeda argument but I decided to wait until the end of the season to lay it out. I was right then. I'm right now. He's doing some things better but there's no reason to care until he can shoot the ball on target and not directly to the keeper. If we haven't taught him to shoot in 2 years either he's incapable of learning or we're incapable of teaching him.
We don't need him on the roster in 2026.
While I remain team"Rip Off the Band-Aid", these are fair points. What a choice though between Mr. Clueless and Mr. Can't Shoot.I agree with your points, but I still think we need to keep Ojeda for roster stability. Maxi might retire, Martínez is out most of the year, and the new SD doesn’t start until Jan 1. We need at least one of Ojeda or Fernández, maybe both, and Ojeda is the only one Pascal trusts to start at RW. By season’s end, Fernández was basically being used as a “float around and try something” sub because he couldn’t be relied on defensively.
Even if Maxi returns, at 39 years old, we still have to replace his and Martínez’s spots in the XI. Ojeda and Fernández were our only real attacking subs last year, if we dump them, we’re either committing Reid, Carrizo, and maybe a Jones comeback or asking the new SD to sign 3–4 attackers immediately. That seems unrealistic.
Given the choice between another half-built, no-depth attack to start 2026 or giving Ojeda one more chance, I’d rather keep Ojeda. For all his faults, his work rate is exceptional, and he clearly cares. I’m tired of the same cycle of starting seasons with a patchwork roster and hoping it clicks late to make some meaningless noise in the playoffs.
While I remain team"Rip Off the Band-Aid", these are fair points. What a choice though between Mr. Clueless and Mr. Can't Shoot.
He'd be a very good 4th forward, and acceptable 3rd forward, but at a much lower salary for either. But he'll be back without a salary reduction and most likely a bump up.Yeah, years post-Taty and the offense is still in rebuild mode; there are no good options. We haven't even touched on Wolf, who, from a resource standpoint, may be our biggest offense roster issue. The guy makes $1.5M, that's a lot of TAM for the extremely streaky production he provides.
Bingo. Give the man a kewpie doll.Is there something to be said about elevating the players around them or making it relatively easier for those players to perform, I.e. pulling a defender away? I don’t know the answer. Is that something that advanced stats can point to?
Is there something to be said about elevating the players around them or making it relatively easier for those players to perform, I.e. pulling a defender away? I don’t know the answer. Is that something that advanced stats can point to?
Goals added (g+) measures a player’s total on-ball contribution in attack and defense. It does this by calculating how much each touch changes their team’s chances of scoring and conceding across two possessions. (Deeper Diver here: What are Goals Added (g+)? — American Soccer Analysis)