I think this is a very valid point, but I still think the other point in how awful that midfield still stands.Yes, we have come a long way, but I'm gonna defend Irola here. Besides being a classy guy, he was the key for our season not going down the tubes. I mean, we made the playoffs and seeded 2nd. When he was switched to DM the team improved 3x. He was not that old, and he could have kept on going 1 or 2 more years. I've always wondered if the reason he looked so vulnerable as right fullback (where he had played for decades for Athletic Bilbao) was because or defense in midfield was so bad. Anyway, yes, horrible lineup.
Iraola was critical to that lineup because having him at the 6 allowed Pirlo to work. And Pirlo had a pretty good year last year. Iraola allowed us to have a formation that included a Pirlo and an attack-minded Lampard.
And while Iraola IMO was arguably one of our most important players last year, we did not need him at the 6 when our other two midfielders were Lopez and Bravo. That combination of lack of technical skills (Lopez and to a lesser extent Bravo) and lack of speed (Iraola and Bravo) and lack of attacking prowess (all 3) was a truly atrocious formula.
Executive Summary: I loved what Iraola did for us last year and can't hate on him. But that starting midfield for that game was just downright awful.