Frank Lampard Thread

To be fair I never saw an actual statement on that myself. But more than one Melbourne fan has come here and said they were told it was to be a 10 game stint. I did see a news story that characterized his loan deal as being for a maximum of 10 games. It's possible then that
  1. the club marketing department went too far and said he'd be there for 10 games in ads even though the 10 game was a limit, not a guarantee
  2. the club carefully worded its ads to play up the 10 game max deal while leaving the impression it was a definite 10 game deal
  3. the club was completely honest and fans just read loosely and assumed a 10-game commitment when none was even implied
I guess it's just another CFG "error."

When it was announce Melbourne City said this: http://www.melbournecityfc.com.au/a...idkytoxh8mib17j1vcv2jgqdy#YZkrGvTKxLRZFGw2.99

Melbourne City FC can today announce that New York City FC-s inaugural player and Spanish World Cup winner David Villa will join the Club for a period of the Hyundai A-League 2014-15 season.

I obviously didn't see or read every bit of marketing from the club but I can't recall one thing from them specifying the number of games he would be available for. In fact I'd say they were pretty careful to avoid committing to a number, or giving the impression that he would be there for the full 10 games. The confusion on 10 games may have been that is the maximum allowed for a guest loan.

I don't think the communication on Villa was great either (nothing like Lampard though). I think they left the door open for Villa to return for a couple of games in December, but a postponed match put a stop to that. So Melbourne City supporters have been left hanging a bit. But I think a bit harsh to accuse them of lying in this case.
 
Kreis finally comments on Frank rod.

http://www.goal.com/en-us/news/1110...no-issues-with-lampard-situation?ICID=HP_BN_1

Sounds like it wasn't his choice but he will deal with it. Disappointing that we didn't get anything in return for the deal, which any other club extending a loan would have gotten. basically being a good employee
After reading this, I wish he'd never commented at all.

"We always knew he'd be coming here in July"? Then your club lied to us, you lied to us directly when he was signed, and I can't trust a word you say from here forward.
 
Wtf Jason? Why not? If it's our player per the plan, why wouldn't we ask for more? Makes me fucking sick. He's drinking the koolaid, too.

Guys, we may be at the wrong place if our fucking coach is all about the "family".

“We’re all one family. We’re not trying to negotiate with Manchester City for what they’re going to be able to give us,” Kreis said. “We were part of that decision and, at the end of the day, we understand the decision that was made. We’re not trying to gain anything. That doesn’t make any sense.”
 
I MEAN, WHAT IS JASON GOING TO SAY? FUCK CFG FUCK EVERYONE? IM PRETTY SURE HE'D RATHER FOCUS ON THE GUYS WHO ARE THERE AND MOVE ON FROM DISTRACTIIONS. HE DOESNT CARE IF FRANK IS THERE OR NOT, IT'S NOT LIKE HIM MAKING A SCENE IS GOING TO CHANGE A THING. IF ANYTHING, IT MAKES IT EVEN MORE OF A PR SHITSHOW AND I THINK HE'D RATHER NOT FAN THE FIRE. IT SUCKS BUT ITS UNDERSTANDABLE. AS FOR FRANK, I'M NOT CONVINCED BUT WHAT'S DONE IS DONE.
AND I'M NOT YELLING, THIS IS HOW I TALK.
 
I MEAN, WHAT IS JASON GOING TO SAY? FUCK CFG FUCK EVERYONE? IM PRETTY SURE HE'D RATHER FOCUS ON THE GUYS WHO ARE THERE AND MOVE ON FROM DISTRACTIIONS. HE DOESNT CARE IF FRANK IS THERE OR NOT, IT'S NOT LIKE HIM MAKING A SCENE IS GOING TO CHANGE A THING. IF ANYTHING, IT MAKES IT EVEN MORE OF A PR SHITSHOW AND I THINK HE'D RATHER NOT FAN THE FIRE. IT SUCKS BUT ITS UNDERSTANDABLE. AS FOR FRANK, I'M NOT CONVINCED BUT WHAT'S DONE IS DONE.
AND I'M NOT YELLING, THIS IS HOW I TALK.

WELL FRANKLY, I LIKED IT BETTER WHEN HE DIDNT SAY ANYTHING THAN TO GRANT HIS STAMP OF APPROVAL ON THIS ASS RAPING.

THIS IS HOW I TALK TOO WHEN IT COMES TO INVOLUNTARY SODOMY.
 
As I said before, the decision was made by our parent company and it was a decision that was made for the best of the entire group, so we support the decision and we move on,” Kreis said. “Through myself and [sporting director Claudio Reyna], it was a decision that was made by the entire group. We have to provide our opinion by what we think and what we want, but we also support the decision. It’s all one group.

Washing his hands of guilt and rightly so.

we have to provide our opinion by what we think and what we want, but we also support the decision
poor guy didn't have a say in the whole thing.
 
Don't be down on Kreis about his comments. Sounds like he and Claudio were at the table arguing for Frank to be at NYCFC as planned and lost the argument. If Lampard was hurt in December and couldn't play until July should Kreis be whining about getting a replacement from MCFC. No. He is talking about building a successful team with the players he has when he has them -- thats his job and thats what he should be doing publicly and privately. Frank's interview was way better than his PR firm's statement. I am still pissed off Lampard isn't going to start the season with us, but don't fault Kreis for not being a team player within the organization -- thats what a smart Coach does and Kreis is a smart coach.
 
detailed Lampard interview, I don't know that I 100% believe everything he says but it's better than the earlier Facebook statement http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/public/sport/article4319252.ece#

Posted my response to this in another thread, but I feel like it should be here too:

Really interesting interview. I'm just gonna quote some of the greatest hits here.
So you signed for . . . ? “New York,” he says. Not New York with a view to signing for City? “No. It was 100 per cent New York. I had sat down with Ferran and it was all about New York. There was no mention of Man City. If they had wanted to speak to me on behalf of Man City, with New York in the pipeline beyond that, they could have done that, because I was a free agent, but that was never the question at all.
So how did Lampard’s pre-contract agreement with New York, which was due to run from January 1, end up superseded by a deal to join City? “This is one of the reasons why I wanted to do this interview, because I’ve heard and seen people say it must have been all contrived that I would join Man City,” he says. “It wasn’t. It was 100 per cent New York. But while all this discussion was going on about the next five or six months, Man City were in town for a pre-season game. I spoke with Manuel Pellegrini and he said he wanted me to come for the first half of the season — simple as that.”
“That is what has frustrated me, that people were sort of saying to me, ‘You knew what you were doing.’ I never would have done that. If I had wanted to come to Man City, then I would stand up and come to Man City. That wouldn’t have been a problem. And in terms of Man City being ‘sneaky’, they could have signed me on a free anyway if that’s what they and I had wanted to do. People mention Financial Fair Play, but what difference would that have made? No difference. It would have been a slippery move, a dodgy move, for nothing. The fact is I signed with New York, then I signed for Man City in the interim and now it has been extended.”
“What I want to say to the New York people is that, yes, my start is going to be delayed by two or three months,” he says. “But when I get there, I’m going to give everything, as I’ve given at Man City, as I’ve given at Chelsea before. I want to win. I’ve seen Stevie say the same, how much he wants to win medals there. He’s like me, I think. We’re both driven. We don’t go somewhere to put our feet up and relax. No matter what we’ve achieved in the past, we will always want more. I will certainly give that to New York.

Probably the least cagey PR coverup-ish thing that has been said about the whole situation from anyone inside. I actually feel a bit better about Lampard now. And surprise, surprise Pellegrini comes out of it still looking like the asshole in all this.
 
And I feel like I should post this here again.

Funny how he gets attributed with all sorts of negative stuff, but it's always misunderstandings and nonsense and lies. Poor SOB must have the worst luck in the world. Seems he spends an awful lot of time explaining himself and clearing his name. It's got to be tough.
 
And I feel like I should post this here again.

_57c8a1a431a592af806925e57258202f.png

I'm not coming around 100% yet, but I appreciate the fact that this actually makes some sense from Frank's perspective, as opposed to the garbage we've gotten in terms of statements from management.
 
Back
Top