That is most likely a fluff piece - BR is known for stretching innuendo. If both clubs are bidding on Jack, MLS can’t show favoritism towards MCFC because of the existing ties - they are bound by a fiduciary responsibility to the league to get the most out of the transfer so if ManU makes a better bid, and NYCFC and Jack are open to “a” transfer in general, then MCFC is going to have to up their offer or lose out.
Somewhat disagree. Man City has already been dealing with MLS for a few years now, not just NYCFC now too with their purchase of Palmer-Brown. Would be in best interest of the league to further that relationship so MLS can get an aging Silva or Aguero (wishful thinking, probably) or some of their young guns that don't pan out for the EPL, while some of MLS's brightest get a chance at Man City.
That said, if it is at Man City bidding $1M and Man United bidding $5M, you obviously go Man United. If it is a $500K to $1M difference, go with the team that has been a partner. (it's funny I am making this argument, because in the Chanot thread I said go with the high bidder)