I look forward to supporting all members of the City family but what I think the Manchester branch needs to recognize is that even though they are the largest and the first club in the family, that doesn't mean they own anyone.
A rich little Arab guy owns everyone. Manchester is just a branch on the tree now.
Pretty good point. But I'd actually say MCFC is the largest apple tree in the orchard, for now and for I'm sure many years to come.
NYC is a sapling. Yep, they are both apple trees and the farmer will use some of the same equipment on his new plant as he does for the old one, but they are not the same tree. Our club, the sapling, is one that is put into a soil that is quite different and requires hands of a different sort who understand this type of land.
The old farmer realizes it, even if his old hands don't. That's another reason he's a good farmer.
To that end, I make this analogy to point out that I don't think anyone here has complaints about the owner of the tree or the orchard. The testiness stems (rimshot) from annoyance directed to those who see our tree as a nifty side project - despite what the ownership states.
To CFG's credit, They seem to understand that it's not a side project for us, and they sure as hell can't treat it as one and also expect us to do our part and breathe life into the club. They get that for NYCFC to bear fruit (seriously, I can't stop), it must be raised for and by those of us here for NYC: our club, in our city, reliant on our efforts, money, and emotional investment to be successful.
Unfortunately, there's been some haughtiness demonstrated by a few people who come here solely because they are MC supporters. I'm not sure how anyone expects those of us here only to talk NYC to take it, but expecting anything else from fans of a NY sports team is demonstrative of a lack of understanding of the differences among the clubs and their respective supporter bases. To hear the same thing on a forum dedicated to our club that we hear in public from supporters of competitors is always going to make hospitality towards those making the statements a very difficult proposition.
They share ownership and resources. They might even share some supporters. But as many have said, NYC won't survive relying on MC supporters. The math doesn't work, and more importantly, the City (yes, I mean NYC. yes, we've called it that for forever.) won't buy in.
Maybe some people have resentment over MC "buying titles" (a rather stupid, obvious thing that everyone does, how the hell else would you get players? Ask for volunteers? Cheap, but ineffective.). I don't feel that way at all, and I've loved Liverpool since I loved football. I honestly hope and expect CFG "buys" us some titles too. I see the conflict more as the failure on a few folks part to appreciate the dynamic here, and their corollary behavior that is inapposite to what might reasonably be expected from a visitor to the board of another club under the purported premise of being friendly.
It's not a perfect analogy, but could you imagine a bunch of Red Sox fans running over to LFC forums to tell them how much they owe them for making ECL this year. You think we're hostile here? Ha. Yeah, our club doesn't yet have the history, but our city does. And we support this club because it is in our city.
Finally, let's be honest here, if history has taught anyone anywhere anything, it's that Americans don't respond positively to British attempts at power. (Have a laugh. I swear it won't kill you. Jokes just zoom by the folks around here. Let's not be such a humorless lot.)