NYCFC Academy - General Discussion

With or without an affiliate league they will still get the best talent in the area to tryouts.

Also, the Academy is adding a younger tier next year - this year's youngest Academy teams are 2004, next year's will be 2006 -- making the affiliate league even less important.

Sure, but is it not a far better thing to have these talented youngsters playing week-in week-out at a league competition where they can be assessed and brought up within the system rather than relying on a try-out session, which everyone knows is subject to circumstance? How many players miss their big shot because they have an off day on trial? Not likely to happen to a player who is essentially having a trial every Saturday for six months a year.

Of course, if NYCFC aren't sending coaches to assess the players then that's another matter, but still better to have the resource available.
 
Sure, but is it not a far better thing to have these talented youngsters playing week-in week-out at a league competition where they can be assessed and brought up within the system rather than relying on a try-out session, which everyone knows is subject to circumstance? How many players miss their big shot because they have an off day on trial? Not likely to happen to a player who is essentially having a trial every Saturday for six months a year.

Of course, if NYCFC aren't sending coaches to assess the players then that's another matter, but still better to have the resource available.

It really doesn't make a difference. The Academy teams turn over so much over the course of a few years at the younger ages. If a kid that belongs on the team has a bad tryout at 11, he'll get there eventually. It really makes little difference to NYCFC when he gets there. And once you get into the mid-tier academy ages you barely even need tryouts anymore - - part oftheir job is knowing who's good in other programs.

The affiliate league was only a small selection of clubs anyway. You'll see next year how few of the kids come from those teams anyway.
 
Who is that number 10 for us?

He and 26 look like ringers. At first I thought 26 was just getting a couple of lucky goals, but then as the reel goes on, you see that he's pretty clever with his movement and takes very good first touches.

10 is on a different level, though.

Of course, you'd be excused for believing Westchester was trained to defend "the City way."

ETA: Maybe FredMertz FredMertz or NYCFCfan NYCFCfan or NYCFC_Dan NYCFC_Dan can tell me?
 
Last edited:
Who is that number 10 for us?

He and 26 look like ringers. At first I thought 26 was just getting a couple of lucky goals, but then as the reel goes on, you see that he's pretty clever with his movement and takes very good first touches.

10 is on a different level, though.

Of course, you'd be excused for believing Westchester was trained to defend "the City way."

ETA: Maybe FredMertz FredMertz or NYCFCfan NYCFCfan or NYCFC_Dan NYCFC_Dan can tell me?

Without watching the video to verify, #10 is Gio Reyna according to the USSDA site.

#26 is Veljko Petkovic, listed as a defender. I'm pretty sure he made some USBNT camps, as I'm familiar with his name.
 
#10 is Gio Reyna!

Non MLS Academy teams can be very inconsistent from year to year. FC Westchester's U18 team is pretty young and were middle of the pack in their DA Division. U18 & U17 are combined right now and their team is mostly U17s. Still an impressive win for NYCFC.
 
#10 is Gio Reyna!

Non MLS Academy teams can be very inconsistent from year to year. FC Westchester's U18 team is pretty young and were middle of the pack in their DA Division. U18 & U17 are combined right now and their team is mostly U17s. Still an impressive win for NYCFC.
Without watching the video to verify, #10 is Gio Reyna according to the USSDA site.

#26 is Veljko Petkovic, listed as a defender. I'm pretty sure he made some USBNT camps, as I'm familiar with his name.
Thanks. So I see what the hype is about with Gio now. He looks like a real prospect in that video.
 
More impressed with his passing and ball control.
I think what's keeping a player like him from being called up is size. Sands has it already. He's already pretty tall. I was 6'3 in 8th grade. Gio looks very small, he'll likely have to hit his growth spurt or bulk up some before being given a chance. He's still very young so there's a lot of time for that.
 
I think what's keeping a player like him from being called up is size. Sands has it already. He's already pretty tall. I was 6'3 in 8th grade. Gio looks very small, he'll likely have to hit his growth spurt or bulk up some before being given a chance. He's still very young so there's a lot of time for that.
Jeezus, you gotta be like 6'8 now
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kjbert and Ulrich