i agree completely, I am very happy to have Meara but...I don't love getting a starting keeper that can't play against a team we could see three or four times. Meara may be good, but that's a real concern.
i agree completely, I am very happy to have Meara but...I don't love getting a starting keeper that can't play against a team we could see three or four times. Meara may be good, but that's a real concern.
I'm taking that as he'd be a no go if the teams meet in the playoffs (bold italics mine).A player on intraleague loan may not compete against his former team during the MLS season (includes MLS games and all other competitions) and must remain with his new team for the entire season.
what?! that is silly
http://www.nycfc.com/post/2014/12/11/new-york-city-fc-brings-meara-exchange-zizzo
Sent Zizzo to NYRB on permanent basis and only get Meara for a season long loan... seems like a lot to give up.
I guess we get a year to find a keeper for the future?what is the likelihood that NYC is able to convert this to a permanent transfer? i guess my concern here is that RBNY made it obvious they did not want to trade him, so what is the benefit to this?
what is the likelihood that NYC is able to convert this to a permanent transfer? i guess my concern here is that RBNY made it obvious they did not want to trade him, so what is the benefit to this?
"Both loans are season-long, and they include the standard non-compete clauses. That means that neither player can compete against their parent club; so when New York City and New York play each other, both Meara and Zizzo will not be eligible to play."
Hopefully we didn't just enter the friend zone with Meara
Sorry but this was a bad move. Zizzo could have contributed, and getting rid of him forever to loan another player only on loan is crazy. And to the fact that any game essentially against RB Meara can't play in, kinda of baffling.
Please someone explain how this was a smart move, and I'll come back from the cliff.
Sorry but this was a bad move. Zizzo could have contributed, and getting rid of him forever to loan another player only on loan is crazy. And to the fact that any game essentially against RB Meara can't play in, kinda of baffling.
Please someone explain how this was a smart move, and I'll come back from the cliff.
Genuine question. I've heard a whole lot of buzz from my Yonkers buddys on Meara but I haven't seen him play much (I vaguely remember some RB game I went to where he was in goal). Is this a positive soccer signing or is it more the sentiment of having a native on the roster that people are excite about? Didn't get within distance of touching Robles for the run in...
I just read that Meara hasn't started a match for RBNY since 2012, so there's no wonder why you "haven't seen him play much".